PDA

View Full Version : Posting fake (public domain), or copyrighted photos...


Pages : [1] 2

Nherentlysinful
February 12th, 2010, 06:17 PM
One of the issues that upsets most of us Amateur Site Posters is fake content. Some users on this site like to post copyrighted and public domain photos on PicHunter--and other sites that have Amateur Communities. Several times I have seen copyrighted material posted on PH (and other sites), and to add insult to injury, the user who posted the material claimed the models were their wive's or girlfriends. Keep in mind that these fakes are usually of well established pornstars. Those of us who have surfed the Internet long enough are gonna recognize some of these fakes because we have seen thousands of photos. I would not mind if someone posted a link to a model's site and claimed, "This is the best ass on the Internet," etc., because at least the user is not claiming the material is his and gives all rights to the model and/or website. I post pictures of my own wife for everyone's entertainment, as most of you other PH users do. It does not bother me that a user may not be able to contribute their own pics to the archives. No one is going to criticize anyone because they have no personal albums or pictures to post. What will get you criticism is posting fakes. There are no rules--that I'm aware of--demanding that you post material. You can simply browse other user's threads and tell them what you think. We love your comments! If you like what you see, leave a comment. If you don't like what you see, than move on to another thread. I did not start this thread to point fingers at guilty parties; I started this thread to ask certain users to be honest and show some respect to us fellow users, the models, and the PH website. Peace.

Wildside
February 13th, 2010, 01:15 AM
There You Go !!!! Preach On,,everyword you said is so true,,my exact thoughts also,,my other problems is when people want to use your thread as a place for cyber sex,,yeah sure tell them what you want to do with them a few times but dont go back and forth with it,,thats what private messages or msn/yahoo messenger is for...and also if a thread is called something like "the tit thread" dont put a pic of your cock on it saying you would use this on their tits,thats not what the person intended the thread to be when they started it,,please read the name and post what everyone goes there to see

swat
February 13th, 2010, 06:36 AM
As most of you will be aware I have been here a while, and have seen this many times. It irritates me. I have even sen users post picture from others threads/profiles on here and claim them to be their own.

Also coming from the admin side of the site, its not good. As anything that has copyright on it, can land the site in hot water, under the copyright laws. This could be anything from a fine to a stint in prision or even the site having to be closed down.


All I can say is if any user notices this fragment off copyright law, can you as a user please post on the thread (saying it's fake or against copyright) and report the post/thread to myself or one of the moderators here. You can report it by clicking on the 'red & white' triangle, in the top right hand corner of the post. Or by PMing a member of the moderator or admin team.

ANY user found to be breaking this rule/LAW will find them self be dealt with severely, under the forum/site rules & regulations.

SWAT
PHf Admin

Nherentlysinful
February 13th, 2010, 03:15 PM
As most of you will be aware I have been here a while, and have seen this many times. It irritates me. I have even sen users post picture from others threads/profiles on here and claim them to be their own.

Also coming from the admin side of the site, its not good. As anything that has copyright on it, can land the site in hot water, under the copyright laws. This could be anything from a fine to a stint in prision or even the site having to be closed down.


All I can say is if any user notices this fragment off copyright law, can you as a user please post on the thread (saying it's fake or against copyright) and report the post/thread to myself or one of the moderators here. You can report it by licking on the 'red & white' triangle, in the top right hand corner of the post. Or by PMing a member of the moderator or admin team.

ANY user found to be breaking this rule/LAW will find them self be dealt with severely, under the forum/site rules & regulations.

SWAT
PHf Admin
We did post messages labeling the photos fake--the model is Desirae Spencer and a very well established pornstar. The guilty user claimed ownership and demanded to another user, the user who originally spotted the fake, to prove the photos were taken from the Internet and to provide URL's to prove it. The other user and I both provided links to her galleries and I advised him to delete his post. He deleted the pics from the thread and removed all the pics from his profile with no further protest.

Nherentlysinful
February 13th, 2010, 03:43 PM
"...and also if a thread is called something like "the tit thread" dont put a pic of your cock on it saying you would use this on their tits,thats not what the person intended the thread to be when they started it,,please read the name and post what everyone goes there to see."

I agree with you, wildside. I don't know why people do that but it can be very frustrating. I guess it can only be attributed to a general lack of consideration for other users. It's the same kind of disregard for fellow users as when someone leaves a derogatory comment about your wife or girlfriend--if you don't find her attractive, don't comment. Communities like PH have so many threads with countless users posting in them that I find it hard to comprehend why some people feel the need to exploit other user's threads??? It just discourages people from sharing their pics with us and depreciates the experience for the rest of us.

paddy57
February 19th, 2010, 06:46 AM
Well said all!

supersexycouple
February 20th, 2010, 02:13 PM
Well I have seen a post where a user is posting pics from a different website. Swat asked him a question to claim they are genuine but they are still being posted. I have seen those pics on another website.

Nherentlysinful
April 8th, 2010, 10:17 AM
Well I have seen a post where a user is posting pics from a different website. Swat asked him a question to claim they are genuine but they are still being posted. I have seen those pics on another website.
Are you referring to another amateur site? Stolen pics from amateur sites are probably the hardest to discover. There are too many of them and all pics are user submitted. I've seen many people at different sites. I personally, usually, use the same user name on other sites I've posted on with the exception of one or two. It's something that everyone should be concerned with, however; you never know who may be using your pics somewhere else.

happytoonz
April 8th, 2010, 08:06 PM
amen to all...its soooo hard to prove "your" pics are not "your" pics, the best i have found is to ask for the poster to hold a Pichunter sign however this takes time which makes me nervous because of reasons swat posted...ei ...laws ...
as far as cocks in the female threads oh god no one hates it worse than me...damn people just read the board rules....

Brandon21
April 8th, 2010, 08:23 PM
I wish pichunter would put a report abuse link on everyones profile. I have noticed just yesterday that someone has used photos from pichunter members to make thier own profiles now tribute pics are fine but I found a photo of me and a friend having sex and he was saying that it is him in the photo and thats his girlfriend!!!!!! Lets just say I sent him a sweet message and the photos have been removed but pichunter please invent something to stop this so us pichunter members who follow your rules and are here to enjoy the site and make freinds dont have to worry about fake people.


Thank you.

and do stop by my profile and add me as a friend

swat
April 9th, 2010, 04:46 AM
I wish pichunter would put a report abuse link on everyones profile. I have noticed just yesterday that someone has used photos from pichunter members to make thier own profiles now tribute pics are fine but I found a photo of me and a friend having sex and he was saying that it is him in the photo and thats his girlfriend!!!!!! Lets just say I sent him a sweet message and the photos have been removed but pichunter please invent something to stop this so us pichunter members who follow your rules and are here to enjoy the site and make freinds dont have to worry about fake people.


Thank you.

and do stop by my profile and add me as a friend

At the top of EVERY postthere is a 'Report Post' button, looks like a small red and white triangel. If a post is reported every mod and admin get an email about the post, detailing why it beeen reported

So you can report a user if you wish. All you do is report a post, and tell us why.

Nherentlysinful
April 14th, 2010, 03:18 PM
I wish pichunter would put a report abuse link on everyones profile. I have noticed just yesterday that someone has used photos from pichunter members to make thier own profiles now tribute pics are fine but I found a photo of me and a friend having sex and he was saying that it is him in the photo and thats his girlfriend!!!!!! Lets just say I sent him a sweet message and the photos have been removed but pichunter please invent something to stop this so us pichunter members who follow your rules and are here to enjoy the site and make freinds dont have to worry about fake people.


Thank you.

and do stop by my profile and add me as a friend
Unfortunately there are people who, for reasons only kown to themselves, post pics of other members' wives, girlfriends, even pics of models, and to add insult to injury these unscrupulous few are claiming ownership of these pics. This kind of behavior is unacceptable. As community members we can try to discourage others from copy right violations and other forms of inappropriate behavior.

We are all here for a unique erotic experience, not to be insulted by another users' rude comments and we don't like to be decieved by fake pics. We should encourage everyone to be true to themselves and to be true to others. We should encourage them to respect and appreciate all members who post pics of wives, girlfriends, husbands, and themselves on this site. We leave ourselves vulnerable when we post pics for the entire world to see, and the last thing anyone wants to hear are derrogatory comments.

We have an amazing community here, let's enjoy it. Let's all play nice with each other and encourage others to play nice as well. We Shoud not try to tell others what to do; we need to lead by example. Even when dealing with members who post fakes or when dealing with someone who wants to be disruptive, we should be nice when we approach them. If they can not be guided to act responsible, then we can take steps to notify staff, etc.

Lizard69uk
May 8th, 2010, 09:15 PM
Unfortunately there are people who, for reasons only kown to themselves, post pics of other members' wives, girlfriends, even pics of models, and to add insult to injury these unscrupulous few are claiming ownership of these pics. This kind of behavior is unacceptable. As community members we can try to discourage others from copy right violations and other forms of inappropriate behavior.

We are all here for a unique erotic experience, not to be insulted by another users' rude comments and we don't like to be decieved by fake pics. We should encourage everyone to be true to themselves and to be true to others. We should encourage them to respect and appreciate all members who post pics of wives, girlfriends, husbands, and themselves on this site. We leave ourselves vulnerable when we post pics for the entire world to see, and the last thing anyone wants to hear are derrogatory comments.

We have an amazing community here, let's enjoy it. Let's all play nice with each other and encourage others to play nice as well. We Shoud not try to tell others what to do; we need to lead by example. Even when dealing with members who post fakes or when dealing with someone who wants to be disruptive, we should be nice when we approach them. If they can not be guided to act responsible, then we can take steps to notify staff, etc.

Hi there,

I was just reading your posts about copyrighted photos. This is a worry I have been having on my own website. It is really difficult to know who is posting fake pics with so many profiles on here. It is very annoying though. I have noticed that there are photos of models too on profiles that do not belong to them. Although I try to place copyright notices on my own photos it is not always easy to control the copying of photos. One would hope that a little respect would be used. Good post. xx

VirtualAdept
May 9th, 2010, 04:41 PM
I'm in much the same boat as you, Lizard. I've just finished uploading the imagery for my wifes site and I know without a doubt that someone will be using one or more of the pictures, claiming its them.
Personally if I find someone doing such, I dont get nasty with them since there's no point, but I complain to the moderator team... pester, bitch, moan, whinge, grisle, whatever it takes to get that content taken down.

With regards to marking the images, I suspect you've found the same as me... its easy adding a border with the site name or whatever on it, but its just as easy to crop it out, but if you use a watermark across the image, even one thats seethrough, nine times out of ten it ruins the picture.

CreamTease
May 9th, 2010, 05:04 PM
With regards to marking the images, I suspect you've found the same as me... its easy adding a border with the site name or whatever on it, but its just as easy to crop it out, but if you use a watermark across the image, even one thats seethrough, nine times out of ten it ruins the picture.

this is what Ive found - getting rid of watermarks is easy if it is on the edge of the photo or on a "non detailed" bit - but if you pust it on the detail it ruins the picture and feels like graffiti.

Still waiting for someone to come up with an idea to solve this! My pics are quite distinctive in style and so easily identifiable as me but I am hoping that people will tend to steal more explicit pics rather than mine!

xx tease

ballarke
May 10th, 2010, 03:44 AM
Ah yes... the seemingly unanswerable question of how to discourage copying or at least detect it when it's occurred. It's definitely a difficult conundrum, as, like VirtualAdept has said, the watermark needs to be in a place that cannot get cropped out. Plus the watermark you adapt needs to be able to retain some level of integrity if someone resizes the image -- meaning don't make it too small otherwise resizing the image down will destroy much of it.

At the same time the watermark could be something not easily seen, but it needs to be discoverable and discernible. After all, if you discover someone posted one of your pics either on this forum or on another site, you need to disclose the watermark to whomever with whom you're filing the report.

You're certainly not alone in trying to figure out how to do this. It's been the subject of much research over at least the last 15 years from what I've seen. Unfortunately, though, you're probably going to have to use some kind of watermark across the detail of the image, as it's the only way to watermark it in such a way it can't be just cropped out. There are various techniques out there -- it's not a young field of research -- so read around and try a few things for yourself.

VirtualAdept
May 10th, 2010, 03:46 PM
There is a way to put the information in the EXIF for the image, but the chances of someone taking the time to look at that are tiny.

ballarke
May 10th, 2010, 08:10 PM
There is a way to put the information in the EXIF for the image, but the chances of someone taking the time to look at that are tiny.

Plus it's very easy to clear away.

VirtualAdept
May 11th, 2010, 10:30 AM
For the average person who'd use someone elses picture claiming its their own? I wouldn't have thought it was tbh.
Oh, and stop bursting my bubble dammit :P

paddy57
May 15th, 2010, 01:46 AM
The next difficulty is people stealing stories and text. I know how much time and effort goes into their production so wonder how to protect them.

Apart from PDF - which can be easily copied - there are not many ways to lock down and protect a story. Even found one on here the other day with the copyright owners name and (c) still included. I told the Mods and it is gone.

VirtualAdept
May 16th, 2010, 05:18 PM
Ya know, its funny you say that, I was just having the same conversation on an erotic literature forum, and they made the exact same point, almost word for word

Miramesaguy
June 16th, 2010, 12:15 PM
Are you referring to another amateur site? Stolen pics from amateur sites are probably the hardest to discover. There are too many of them and all pics are user submitted. I've seen many people at different sites. I personally, usually, use the same user name on other sites I've posted on with the exception of one or two. It's something that everyone should be concerned with, however; you never know who may be using your pics somewhere else.

yeah very true, sad truth of the internet is once its out there its out there forever and anyone can use it. u run that risk every time u post. but its sad that people that are honest users just wanting to share themselves, there lifestyle, with others and just having a good time can get ripped off by some fake user posting there body claiming at there own pics and having the original user not get any of the credit. its not right and not fair. im glad there's networks of people checking and reporting when fake ones come up but i agree its always an uphill battle for amateurs and regular posting users because there not as out there and easy to identify as mainstream porn stars.

shineysideup
October 2nd, 2010, 05:13 PM
More to the point for me is, WHY? Anyone who spends time on the net will know you're a plagiarist at best and a looser by any other standard!

makn1726
October 2nd, 2010, 05:21 PM
More to the point for me is, WHY? Anyone who spends time on the net will know you're a plagiarist at best and a looser by any other standard!

thank u......... the best is when they get there pics right off of the main PH page......... i mean c'mon really like we didnt see them right before we got on today

CreamTease
October 2nd, 2010, 05:22 PM
thank u......... the best is when they get there pics right off of the main PH page......... i mean c'mon really like we didnt see them right before we got on today

Im so stupid I never spot them (unless they are obvious airbrushed pro porn photos). But then I probably dont do as much "research" as some of the guys here do! ;)

I just have to hope my photos are too tame to tempt anyone to steal them

xx tease

shineysideup
October 2nd, 2010, 05:23 PM
Can I post you as my girlfriend:D

CreamTease
October 2nd, 2010, 05:24 PM
Can I post you as my girlfriend:D

:rotfl:

I wonder how long before anyone noticed...and then how long before they did anything about it!

xx tease

shineysideup
October 2nd, 2010, 05:29 PM
Apparently, being quick isn't necessarily a good thing:rotfl:

CreamTease
January 6th, 2011, 11:32 AM
the other problem is that some members here are actually pro togs, so we then get a load of abuse saying that we have stolen the images, there is a thing in ps that allows you to put file info into the hidden elements of an image but then on a site like this not everybody wants everyone to know all their details, I honestly do not think that it can be policed, but a quick look at a persons profile should usually give you an answer.

there was someone on here about 6-12 months ago - had an established thread. Then it turned out all their pics actually belonged to someone on literotica who had posted them there. The person from literotica found out, cmae here and was able to do a verify pic to prove they were theirs.

No way anyone could have known they didnt belong to the original poster by looking at their profile unfortunately...

xx tease

Miramesaguy
January 8th, 2011, 01:48 AM
there was someone on here about 6-12 months ago - had an established thread. Then it turned out all their pics actually belonged to someone on literotica who had posted them there. The person from literotica found out, cmae here and was able to do a verify pic to prove they were theirs.

No way anyone could have known they didnt belong to the original poster by looking at their profile unfortunately...

xx tease

the internet: the greatest and worst intention of technology

axeman
January 8th, 2011, 12:29 PM
Amen ... things were sure alot simpler before Al Gore invented it >>>lol

the internet: the greatest and worst intention of technology

toady
January 8th, 2011, 12:50 PM
One of the issues that upsets most of us Amateur Site Posters is fake content. Some users on this site like to post copyrighted and public domain photos on PicHunter--and other sites that have Amateur Communities. Several times I have seen copyrighted material posted on PH (and other sites), and to add insult to injury, the user who posted the material claimed the models were their wive's or girlfriends. Keep in mind that these fakes are usually of well established pornstars. Those of us who have surfed the Internet long enough are gonna recognize some of these fakes because we have seen thousands of photos. I would not mind if someone posted a link to a model's site and claimed, "This is the best ass on the Internet," etc., because at least the user is not claiming the material is his and gives all rights to the model and/or website. I post pictures of my own wife for everyone's entertainment, as most of you other PH users do. It does not bother me that a user may not be able to contribute their own pics to the archives. No one is going to criticize anyone because they have no personal albums or pictures to post. What will get you criticism is posting fakes. There are no rules--that I'm aware of--demanding that you post material. You can simply browse other user's threads and tell them what you think. We love your comments! If you like what you see, leave a comment. If you don't like what you see, than move on to another thread. I did not start this thread to point fingers at guilty parties; I started this thread to ask certain users to be honest and show some respect to us fellow users, the models, and the PH website. Peace.

Amen, I used to mod here and what you say is what we tried to maintain! :thumbsup:

P.S. If it makes ya feel any better, it can get worse... at another site where I was a mod a guy was posting pics of girls pretending to be them.. it was subtle enough he got away with it for quite a while and had a huge thread of admirers... this went on for a long time... i smelled the rat and kept harassing him till someone finally caught him.. I suspect he was trying to get guys to send pics of themselves to him privately.

Sweet Angel
January 9th, 2011, 09:41 AM
It happens on every site

ballarke
January 9th, 2011, 05:42 PM
It happens on every site

That's the unfortunate thing about having things posted for public consumption: copyright and authorship becomes difficult, if not damn near impossible to enforce. People will post pics here from other sites, and others will take pics from here and post them elsewhere. It's happened before and it'll keep happening.

Diligence is required, and if the mods have any reason to suspect that a person is posting pics they don't own or of a girl who has not given her consent to these pics being here, we will call them out. I've done it a few times, and even if you're a general user, if you have reason to believe the pics aren't genuine -- posting of a girl who didn't give consent, posting pics from other sites, etc -- then call them out publicly.

One technique that has been exercised in this forum before is to ask the poster to take a pic of the model holding a sign with some arbitrary, handwritten phrase on it. Another forum I've encountered uses a similar technique to "certify" users are who they claim.

Now obviously some amount of fair use is permitted, but the only fair use I've seen with regard to this forum is posting a pic to ask who a particular model is. There isn't much you can do with this forum beyond that and still remain within fair use.

CreamTease
January 9th, 2011, 05:53 PM
what also worries me though...

is that once those photos are posted on here...there is no way of removing them from PH Society. Even the admin/mods on here have no authority to be able to do that

There was a woman recently who found someone had posted her pics on here and was desperately trying to get them removed.

I dont know what happened in the end but do know that for seveal weeks she kept asking as swat was unable to help.

Worrying to think once someone posts them - the damage is done and is pretty much irreversible - even if they are taken down from the forums, no-one is around who can take them down from Public view.

xx tease

ballarke
January 9th, 2011, 06:28 PM
The synchronization between Society and the forum certainly needs improvement. Back when Society was new, I expressed concern about it and the fact that there were girls who stopped posting on the forum because they had been discovered by people they knew -- one girl I named specifically. I was arguably one of PH Society's most vocal dissenters.

With the pics to which you're referring, CT, the pictures are no longer publicly available on PH Society.

But the issue goes well beyond PH Society. As I said, any picture you post here could be copied by someone and posted elsewhere, either as a masquerade or with other purposes in mind. It will be a never-ending issue, and the best we can do is to be diligent.

CreamTease
January 9th, 2011, 06:37 PM
The synchronization between Society and the forum certainly needs improvement. Back when Society was new, I expressed concern about it and the fact that there were girls who stopped posting on the forum because they had been discovered by people they knew -- one girl I named specifically. I was arguably one of PH Society's most vocal dissenters.

With the pics to which you're referring, CT, the pictures are no longer publicly available on PH Society.

But the issue goes well beyond PH Society. As I said, any picture you post here could be copied by someone and posted elsewhere, either as a masquerade or with other purposes in mind. It will be a never-ending issue, and the best we can do is to be diligent.

good to know they are now down.Thanks for that news xx

I guess although the issue goes beyond PH - the point I was making about Society (as an exmaple) was - even if you find them- doesnt mean thats the end of it!

xx tease

axeman
January 10th, 2011, 02:58 PM
i'm pretty sure no one is gonna steal any of my pics ...lol
but it is true that any one can download a pic and then post it wherever they want ..... could be embarrassing to see something from here pop up on something like FB ...

VirtualAdept
January 12th, 2011, 05:11 PM
there was someone on here about 6-12 months ago - had an established thread. Then it turned out all their pics actually belonged to someone on literotica who had posted them there. The person from literotica found out, cmae here and was able to do a verify pic to prove they were theirs.

No way anyone could have known they didnt belong to the original poster by looking at their profile unfortunately...

xx tease


Yeah, there was much discussion over on Lit about that... she was not impressed at all. Not that I blame her of course

NikkiTeen
January 14th, 2011, 06:43 AM
I only post my own personal pics (even though they are on my site too). I posed with a PH sign to confirm, wish that was manditory!

Veteran
January 18th, 2011, 09:40 AM
Yeah, maybe some kind of validation photo with username and pichunter written somewhere in the picture on a card (or body part) might be a good idea. Certainly something I'll consider in my threads in future (if only to stop slimy little cave trolls stealing the pics)

VirtualAdept
January 29th, 2011, 05:10 PM
I posed with a PH sign to confirm, wish that was manditory!

My issue with that is I post pics of my wife both here and on another forum. I dont much fancy taking every picture twice, once for each forum to make sure I have some sort of sign saying what forum its being posted on, ya know?

ballarke
June 24th, 2011, 04:18 PM
this entire thread

http://forum.pichunter.com/showthread.php?t=76003

So are you alleging that the entire thread is nothing but stolen pics? Do you have any links or anything to back up that allegation?

VirtualAdept
June 24th, 2011, 05:18 PM
I've been hearing about a "fair use" clause in the US copyright law, but I've not had chance to look into it yet.

ballarke
June 24th, 2011, 05:24 PM
Fair use is a concept in which use of a copyrighted work without the permission of the copyright owner is allowed, but only in a very limited set of circumstances. And reproducing an entire photo that you do not own and posting it on a forum is NOT fair use.

VirtualAdept
June 24th, 2011, 05:35 PM
Fair use is a concept in which use of a copyrighted work without the permission of the copyright owner is allowed, but only in a very limited set of circumstances. And reproducing an entire photo that you do not own and posting it on a forum is NOT fair use.


I was thinking you could use the entire image for comparison etc, though like I say, I've not had chance to read up on it yet.
Doesn' really affect me since my work is subject to UK copyright law, which allows no such thing.

With regards to the above thread, using one image I found six sites showing the same (and more) pics, but they're amateurish sites, so I'm not convinced one way or t'other tbh.

ballarke
June 24th, 2011, 05:43 PM
With regards to the above thread, using one image I found six sites showing the same (and more) pics, but they're amateurish sites, so I'm not convinced one way or t'other tbh.

Which is perfectly fine if it's the same person posting them on both sites. This forum doesn't require you post exclusively to this forum, only that you own what you post. Claire will probably be contacted by an admin or mod about the pics in question to make sure everything's legit.

But on you previous question, posting a pic for comparison is generally discouraged in favor of posting a link to where you found it. Not illegal, in my opinion, though.

VirtualAdept
June 24th, 2011, 05:54 PM
Which is perfectly fine if it's the same person posting them on both sites. This forum doesn't require you post exclusively to this forum, only that you own what you post. Claire will probably be contacted by an admin or mod about the pics in question to make sure everything's legit.

It aint the same person posting, but from what i saw it could quite feasibly be someone doing there what the above user suggested she's doing here.

But on you previous question, posting a pic for comparison is generally discouraged in favor of posting a link to where you found it. Not illegal, in my opinion, though.

I dont see any reason such a comparison would be required on this site tbh, though I do take your point on board.
Linking back to an image is, to my mind, nothing like using the image, since you're not passing it off as your own or posting it without permission, you're in fact sending traffic to (hopefully) the creators own site so at least they get the credit for it.

swat
June 25th, 2011, 06:05 AM
I have been notified about this thread/user before. When I looked into her before I was satisfied with the conclusion I came to. As you can see the user is still here, so you can tell what conclusion I came to.

CreamTease
June 25th, 2011, 11:52 AM
omg was lauren a fake? She was REALLY popular here for so long. I never knew it turned out she was fake?

she and Claire were supposedly "friends". So how does that work if she was a fake - are both of them the same person???

:huh::huh:

CreamTease
June 25th, 2011, 11:57 AM
I found some photos on here which were supposedly of a wife who had "just agreed to let them be shown" but were VERY different quality to the others on the thread which made me suspicious

When I checked on tineye they are on 14 sites - some of which are pro sites so they are definitely NOT the property of the user from here.

But they are still there on the users thread despite reporting them and giving info on the links and everything.

:huh:

ballarke
June 25th, 2011, 02:30 PM
i posted links to the other sites "she" is on and you still keep her fake ass here? more proof.

http://forum.pichunter.com/showpost.php?p=1507273&postcount=1152

And if you were to do a search for some of CreamTease's photos, you'd likely find them elsewhere on the Internet as well. Does that mean that CreamTease is "fake"?

Up here on this forum we prefer to give people the benefit of doubt. Unless you have clear and conclusive evidence that the person who owns the pics is not the same as the person who posted the pics, your "proof" falls flat. And it is clear and conclusive evidence that is needed to substantiate your claim. Proof is an empty word.

There've been numerous times I've suspected pics of being stolen from other sites, but have not been able to find the evidence to substantiate that suspicion, so I've left it alone, not even posting my suspicion. I think swat is saying you should probably do the same unless, as I said, you have clear and convincing evidence. And links to other amateurish sites isn't clear and convincing.

CreamTease
June 25th, 2011, 02:48 PM
And if you were to do a search for some of CreamTease's photos, you'd likely find them elsewhere on the Internet as well. Does that mean that CreamTease is "fake"?

Up here on this forum we prefer to give people the benefit of doubt. Unless you have clear and conclusive evidence that the person who owns the pics is not the same as the person who posted the pics, your "proof" falls flat. And it is clear and conclusive evidence that is needed to substantiate your claim. Proof is an empty word.

There've been numerous times I've suspected pics of being stolen from other sites, but have not been able to find the evidence to substantiate that suspicion, so I've left it alone, not even posting my suspicion. I think swat is saying you should probably do the same unless, as I said, you have clear and convincing evidence. And links to other amateurish sites isn't clear and convincing.

but I would be happy to prove I am me by posing in the same panties/shoes etc with a sign... and wouldnt mind being asked. Those who are real typically have no problem with proving it...

A bit like being breathalised - I would never mind a spot check if it stops people doing things which they shouldnt and means people can have a little more faith on here.

xx

ballarke
June 25th, 2011, 03:32 PM
At the same time, everyone is entitled to a presumption of innocence. This means that no person has a right to accuse you of anything -- including posting pics you don't own -- without evidence to back up the accusation. While you might not mind a "spot-check", you also have the right to refuse it and demand that an officer justify the breathalyzer before giving it. Well, at least in the United States you have that right, but everywhere, everyone has the right to a presumption of innocence.

but I would be happy to prove I am me by posing in the same panties/shoes etc with a sign... and wouldnt mind being asked. Those who are real typically have no problem with proving it...

A bit like being breathalised - I would never mind a spot check if it stops people doing things which they shouldnt and means people can have a little more faith on here.

xx

CreamTease
June 25th, 2011, 05:09 PM
At the same time, everyone is entitled to a presumption of innocence. This means that no person has a right to accuse you of anything -- including posting pics you don't own -- without evidence to back up the accusation. While you might not mind a "spot-check", you also have the right to refuse it and demand that an officer justify the breathalyzer before giving it. Well, at least in the United States you have that right, but everywhere, everyone has the right to a presumption of innocence.

thats fine.

But if someone THOUGHT I was guilty and I knew I wasnt - I wouldnt want them wondering. I would want to show I wasnt.

And similarly, when I find folk on here including professional shots from pro porn sites on their thread - I tend to think they have stolen them (or they should be on the Porn Stars part of the site). So they might be entitled to a presumption of innocence - but my belief in them is then tarnished unless they can prove they really ARE a pro and they really DO own the shots.

If anyone doubted me I would rather know and prove myself than have them have one iota of doubt.

Thankfully the fact that I have a limited collection of lingerie and shoes - and post so often on here means that the guys probably know my wardrobe better than me and are able to suggest what combination I should wear next time!

I wore some clothes out the other day that I had worn for shoots on here and was convinced I would get approached in the street and asked "CreamTease????"

:rotfl:

I do understand what you are saying ballarke. But I also know of at least 2 people on here who are posting pro photos they dont own. I couldnt prove it in a court of law because I dont know they didnt have a porn career before they joined the site. But my respect for them is 0 because in all liklihood - they just downloaded them.


xx

PS how the hell do you spell liklihood??? :D

ballarke
June 25th, 2011, 06:56 PM
I'm similar to you in that regard. My point of view on a person may be tarnished, but unless I can demonstrate my accusation being true, thus resulting in someone getting banned from the forum, I'm not going to post an accusation. And I also have enough knowledge to know to not call something "proof", even if I can show conclusively that someone is posting stolen pictures.

I can understand as well that you'd want to "clear your name", so to speak. But at the same time, some people will have their mind pretty made up about whether you're guilty, regardless of the effort you take to clear your name. And some people take your efforts to clear your name as evidence that you're guilty, while others will take a lack of effort to prove your innocence as evidence of guilt. Damned if you do, damned if you don't, and it makes determining whether to attempt to defend yourself all the more frustrating.

PS... it's likelihood.

thats fine.

But if someone THOUGHT I was guilty and I knew I wasnt - I wouldnt want them wondering. I would want to show I wasnt.

And similarly, when I find folk on here including professional shots from pro porn sites on their thread - I tend to think they have stolen them (or they should be on the Porn Stars part of the site). So they might be entitled to a presumption of innocence - but my belief in them is then tarnished unless they can prove they really ARE a pro and they really DO own the shots.

If anyone doubted me I would rather know and prove myself than have them have one iota of doubt.

Thankfully the fact that I have a limited collection of lingerie and shoes - and post so often on here means that the guys probably know my wardrobe better than me and are able to suggest what combination I should wear next time!

I wore some clothes out the other day that I had worn for shoots on here and was convinced I would get approached in the street and asked "CreamTease????"

:rotfl:

I do understand what you are saying ballarke. But I also know of at least 2 people on here who are posting pro photos they dont own. I couldnt prove it in a court of law because I dont know they didnt have a porn career before they joined the site. But my respect for them is 0 because in all liklihood - they just downloaded them.


xx

PS how the hell do you spell liklihood??? :D

CreamTease
June 25th, 2011, 07:03 PM
PS... it's likelihood.

:D

thank you xxxxxxxxx

ballarke
June 25th, 2011, 10:12 PM
you do realize that i pointed out in her own thread that she has pics of "her & lauren" and it's clearly not either one of them, right?

And you do realize that people get told all the time that they look "nothing like" their driver license photo and other photos of them, right?

tansrednab
June 27th, 2011, 12:46 PM
As for Claire, I can attest that I have different pic sets downloaded from a filesharing website that she has claimed in her thread are her. These are wildly different women. I know it's not conclusive proof, but I've been convinced she's a fake for ages now.

CreamTease
July 6th, 2011, 03:55 AM
well looky here. :D

http://forum.pichunter.com/showpost.php?p=1514285&postcount=1156

how odd tho. To have great genuine photos...and then post other peoples?

Even odder to be telling everyone your "real life friend" has posted lots of fake photos that are definitely not of her.

but well done you for noticing things werent as they seemed.

xx

swat
September 23rd, 2011, 03:58 AM
What do we think about this one?

http://forum.pichunter.com/showthread.php?t=99812

I only see 1 picture I've seen here before. As you can see I questioned it in the thread, and it deleted rarther quickly.

phillywilly187
September 23rd, 2011, 06:18 AM
What do we think about this one?

http://forum.pichunter.com/showthread.php?t=99812

I only see 1 picture I've seen here before. As you can see I questioned it in the thread, and it deleted rarther quickly.

LOL! Wrong fake pic to use since its one of "Claires" anyway! Oh well, we'll just have to see if the accused will post a verification pic.

VirtualAdept
September 23rd, 2011, 09:47 AM
Those pictures do crop up on an awful lot of websites... not that that proves owt, of course

swat
September 23rd, 2011, 10:06 AM
Totaly different face's, in the pictures.

VirtualAdept
September 23rd, 2011, 10:13 AM
Hang on, hang on, lemme put me glasses on.
No, tbh, I'm not sure on that, the face shots that is. I do notice tattooes and piercings go walkabout in some of the shots.

swat
September 23rd, 2011, 10:31 AM
Im mainly looking at the 1 pic that I pulled her on (When I get chance later tonight Im gona look at the rest of them closer). The one with cum on her stomach and the one I linked to.

VirtualAdept
September 23rd, 2011, 10:49 AM
Im mainly looking at the 1 pic that I pulled her on (When I get chance later tonight Im gona look at the rest of them closer). The one with cum on her stomach and the one I linked to.


Oh, aye, fully agree with that one, having looked at the whole pic, that face is different to the rest.
I still query the piercings going missing with no, for want fo a better word, hole left behind.

swat
September 24th, 2011, 06:03 AM
I had a look last night myself, and I aint to sure myself. Just have to wait and see what they have to say.

huppenkothen
September 28th, 2011, 06:07 PM
I would like to add my thoughts on this, since fakes are quite a problem here as in other similar sites as well.

To beginn with I assume that some 90% of users at (porn-) social sites are men. Of the remaining 10% also 90% are men, pretending to be the girl they found pics on the net. For what purpose only heaven knows?!

Thus the problem is how to recognise the shams. Here are some general ideas:

1. A few scrappy pics with a urge below them like 'guys cum on my pics' is highly suspicious. Often enough have I recieved such PMs too, and when I wanted some other pics their cameras were just broken:grin2:

2. It is usefull to have a close look on all body parts of the displayed person(s), since most fakers do not even bother to post only one girl's pictures in the same thread (!)

3. If the pics belong to a set floating on the net allready, it's unlikely the owner has just decided to start posting them in your particular forum. Still more unlikely is that a well known pro has just turned amateur again:D

4. Seeing the same girl simultaneously in two or more forums doesn't in itself mean (s)he is a fake. Unless profile-details like age, location etc vary considerably the only thing to do is stay alert before you know the girl better.

5. Language often does not go with the pics. Ie postings from some 19 year old english girl with expressions rather that of a 50+ scandinavian male.

If I ever were to administrate a forum I wouldn't let anybody join without a foolproof verification pic;)

Cheers,
h

blueyedvixen
October 5th, 2011, 07:26 AM
I hate finding these people, its not right.....most of the time when I report people it is because the guy posts 10 pics in his profile and they are all different, different dick sizes, even colors, different faces, different body structures.....the women have different breast sizes, faces, moles that dont match up lol Lauren was so fake, she had all different shit....sets of pics that were the same, but 10 different sets lol wow.....all my pics are me....easy to tell because of my tattoos....not sure if thats a good thing hahaha

urbusted
October 5th, 2011, 01:16 PM
User: Blackdog (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=155517)

Albums (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?u=155517) Pics are all novice and do not look professional at all.

After a few pics in "her" thread (http://forum.pichunter.com/showthread.php?t=95349), they all look professional and all the surroundings are cropped. I'd say it's a FAKE!

VirtualAdept
October 5th, 2011, 01:51 PM
I dunno... I agree the last few pics in the thread are definitely not theirs, but thats not to say the rest aren't.

ballarke
October 5th, 2011, 03:51 PM
I'm going to agree with urbusted, and I've got the evidence to go with it. By the way, if you're going to make allegations that someone is posting pics they don't own, try to back it up with something. Saying that pics start out amateurish but then later ones look professional isn't enough for at least two reason:

1. A person's photography skills can and may improve over time, meaning later pics look more "professional" than earlier ones, and
2. A better camera could be used for later pics, providing better results.

The pics I have posted in albums on my profile were taken with a cheap 2 MP camera about 7 years ago. If I were to take similar pics with my DSLR (not showing my wife's face), you'd probably make similar assumptions or allegations.

Anyway, back to the evidence: The pic in this post (http://forum.pichunter.com/showpost.php?p=1555686&postcount=49) can be found on this promo page (http://webmasters.wetandpuffy.com/fhg.php?id=8025f80d3017bb4f49644d2500a5762f&affil=2036638).

VirtualAdept
October 5th, 2011, 03:55 PM
I'm going to agree with urbusted, and I've got the evidence to go with it.

Fair enough, I'll bow to your wisdom there :)

Saying that pics start out amateurish but then later ones look professional isn't enough for at least two reason:

1. A person's photography skills can and may improve over time, meaning later pics look more "professional" than earlier ones, and
2. A better camera could be used for later pics, providing better results.

The pics I have posted in albums on my profile were taken with a cheap 2 MP camera about 7 years ago. If I were to take similar pics with my DSLR (not showing my wife's face), you'd probably make similar assumptions or allegations.


Thats certainly the case with myself and my wife's pics.

VirtualAdept
October 5th, 2011, 03:57 PM
Anyway, back to the evidence: The pic in this post (http://forum.pichunter.com/showpost.php?p=1555686&postcount=49) can be found on this promo page (http://webmasters.wetandpuffy.com/fhg.php?id=8025f80d3017bb4f49644d2500a5762f&affil=2036638).

Forgot to say, does that necessarily preclude the original pics from being theirs?

blueyedvixen
October 5th, 2011, 04:09 PM
I think they are fake too.....the first pics look real, everything after looks like a much younger girl.....just my opinion

ballarke
October 5th, 2011, 04:12 PM
Forgot to say, does that necessarily preclude the original pics from being theirs?

It gives reason to call the earlier pics into question, but the fact that there is a birth control or nicotine patch clearly visible in the earlier pictures I believe gives reason to doubt those pics are "fake". Something like that in a pic taken by a professional porn site would likely have been dubbed an "occlusion" by the photographers and would either have been "airbrushed" away or creatively cropped out.

But at the same time, someone's pics with evidence that something like moles or birth control patches being airbrushed out doesn't mean the pics don't belong to the person who posted them. The person posting the pics could be a professional or advanced amateur who knows how to airbrush out things like that and still make the pic look realistic. While most of the people who post pics are amateurs without a lot of photography skill, there are bound to be a few who pay attention to photo quality.

And then there are members like Karissa. If you look at the quality progression of her pics from her earliest to her latest, there is a clear transition. But she also has a professional DSLR and is also a professional photographer.

This is why I said evidence is needed. Allegations are not enough. And as such, if you're going to call pics into question, there needs to be evidence to back that up. There've been numerous, numerous times I've doubted pics belonged to the OP, but I've held back on broadcasting that allegation because I didn't have anything to back it up.

VirtualAdept
October 5th, 2011, 04:18 PM
Thanks for the reply, Ballarke, I think you've explained that perfectly and hopefully will result in people slating others as fakes without proper evidence, and also illustrates the various reasons for the differences in quality/look of users pics.
Have some rep.

blueyedvixen
October 5th, 2011, 04:19 PM
I can see where people would crop out moles and such, but when no moles are doctored out and the moles are in totally different places or different sizes or breasts are different sizes, nipples are way different, faces are different or what ever I think that is evidence enough because they are taking them from someone else......I know this is kinda off subject but I reported this girl on here for being obviously under age.....she was deleted and there was no evidence that she was 15 other than the fact that her room looked like that of a child and she used mascara tubes to penetrate her virgin vagina.....to me stealing is almost as bad because it's violating the rules, no matter how you look at it.

ballarke
October 5th, 2011, 04:34 PM
Let's compare what you've just said to what urbusted said above:

After a few pics in "her" thread, they all look professional and all the surroundings are cropped. I'd say it's a FAKE!

I reported this girl on here for being obviously under age.....she was deleted and there was no evidence that she was 15 other than the fact that her room looked like that of a child and she used mascara tubes to penetrate her virgin vagina...

Vixen, you've backed up your allegation. You don't need to prove your allegation beyond reasonable doubt here, but you do need to provide something believable. In your other example, if you can show clear differences between the pictures being posted that give reason to believe they are not as claimed by the person posting them, then do so.

The post by urbusted I quoted above is an unsubstantiated allegation, plain and simple. Cropped surroundings aren't evidence that pics are "fake" because we've seen it quite a bit here. However, Vixen, if you show anatomical differences, then great. But here are a few other things to bear in mind:

1. Breast size differences: plastic surgery -- both enlargements and reductions for which scars may not be readily noticeable
2. Moles, scars and other skin occlusions: some may be airbrushed or covered with makeup in some pics but visible in others

We do try to give posters the benefit of doubt. No one likes allegations being made against them, especially ones that can be easily refuted or are at their base unsubstantiated. Now if you can clearly show that a pic is a cropped version of one available on the web, that's different and will likely lead to the poster getting banned.

But if you're going to make an allegation, you need to back it up.

blueyedvixen
October 5th, 2011, 05:21 PM
Yeah I get what you're saying Hun.....I didn't mean breast augmentation, I mean totally different sets of breasts.....like one has pancake nipples and the other has little ones lol it's a shame that people come here and do that. I would never, I wanna be worshipped for what I have haha

Hersheyhighway
October 5th, 2011, 05:24 PM
Yeah I get what you're saying Hun.....I didn't mean breast augmentation, I mean totally different sets of breasts.....like one has pancake nipples and the other has little ones lol it's a shame that people come here and do that. I would never, I wanna be worshipped for what I have haha

And you are :bow::bow::bow:

xxnobelxx69
October 12th, 2011, 08:08 AM
Alot of the fakes I have seen on here have been ones me and my gf both have seen alot of, mostly in advertisments. I see no enjoyment of posting a fake pic.

hyvolts69
October 16th, 2011, 05:50 AM
Fakers Suck!

ballarke
November 2nd, 2011, 10:00 PM
Okay, let's record this one for posterity since he decided to delete his thread:

User: mike_oxaflopin
Thread: "Sexual conquests (http://forum.pichunter.com/showthread.php?p=1581157)" (link will likely work only for mods)

One of the pics (http://forum.pichunter.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=500351&d=1320258137) came up with 29 results through TinEye, one of which is a "demotivational" poster with a caption written in Cyrillic. One of the pics posted to an album (since removed) in which he had the left-side cropped off so the subject's face wasn't showing came up with 10 hits showing the full picture.

blueyedvixen
November 2nd, 2011, 10:38 PM
Wow that dude is out of control with his smug attitude.....anyone can tell those are fake or not his. I hope you deleted him

ballarke
November 2nd, 2011, 10:39 PM
Wow that dude is out of control with his smug attitude.....anyone can tell those are fake or not his. I hope you deleted him

Unfortunately I'm not a forum-wide moderator. My mod powers are currently limited only to Sex Advice.

blueyedvixen
November 2nd, 2011, 10:40 PM
Really??? Want me to take care of him LOL

ballarke
November 2nd, 2011, 10:49 PM
As much fun as I'm sure you'd have with it, I'd say let's let one of the admins take care of him. He's likely not coming back anyway, so it likely doesn't matter.

blueyedvixen
November 2nd, 2011, 10:58 PM
Well the way I see it he deserves a couple infractions, but I think you are right, he hasnt been on in a month....maybe he will just not come back.....but yes, I always have fun with the smug bastards and bitchy women on here :D

ballarke
November 2nd, 2011, 11:19 PM
Hasn't been on in a month? Is your calendar synched right? He joined and posted that thread today.

blueyedvixen
November 2nd, 2011, 11:41 PM
haha youre right, I was mixed up.....blonde moment, sorry

urbusted
November 3rd, 2011, 11:12 AM
Okay, let's record this one for posterity since he decided to delete his thread:

User: mike_oxaflopin
Thread: "Sexual conquests (http://forum.pichunter.com/showthread.php?p=1581157)" (link will likely work only for mods)

One of the pics (http://forum.pichunter.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=500351&d=1320258137) came up with 29 results through TinEye, one of which is a "demotivational" poster with a caption written in Cyrillic. One of the pics posted to an album (since removed) in which he had the left-side cropped off so the subject's face wasn't showing came up with 10 hits showing the full picture.

i reported him. what a sleaze ball!

swat
November 3rd, 2011, 11:44 AM
Well he's gone anyway, did it this morning, only just noticed you had posted this here.

Thank to the pair of you for noticing and reporting it.

blueyedvixen
November 3rd, 2011, 02:25 PM
So jessygirl got back on after being banned for 10 days.....still posting all the different girls on her profile and threads.....her and I emailed each other back and forth last night for hours, I was trying to give her the benefit of the doubt, she swore that the pics were her, siting facebook as proof.....so I told her numerous times to delete the ones that where not her, she would delete a few then come back to me being all nice. She had 4 or 5 groups of pics that were 5 different girls, you could tell from their body shapes, skin tones, tattoos, butt size, breast shape, nipple shape and most important 5 different faces......she would leave certain ones from each group and claim they were her......she has been publicly rude to the mods and im just sick and tired of her......it appears she has deleted herself, but something tells me she will pop up again, maybe under a different name.

blueyedvixen
November 3rd, 2011, 02:33 PM
no no wait, swat deleted her haha.....yeah she told me last night that she was really 19, but that she wanted to tease the guys and say she was 18 blah blah......I was like ya know you arent fooling anyone.....good bye

Hersheyhighway
November 3rd, 2011, 05:32 PM
no no wait, swat deleted her haha.....yeah she told me last night that she was really 19, but that she wanted to tease the guys and say she was 18 blah blah......I was like ya know you arent fooling anyone.....good bye


Tease the guys....I'll take real women...no teasing...just plain sexy hot.

Was tired of her crap also....Always..if you do this....I'll do that...whats this..lets make a deal.....goodbye is right....now..back to the real ladies of PH.

axeman
November 3rd, 2011, 05:42 PM
i wait for the real women to find me haha ...

i always seem to waiting thou ... lol

ballarke
November 26th, 2011, 04:49 PM
Given how long this person has been posting, it pains me to have to do this, but I must call out GothicQueen (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=338552). I've had a sneaking suspicion that she was not entirely genuine, so in doing some image searches of the pictures she's posted to this forum, I think I've confirmed it.


Image attached to this post can be found in this gallery: http://v4.collegehotbox.com/photo-set-00277/
Image attached to this post and this post can be found here with the watermark intact: http://imageshost.ru/links/e7a262a3012a624f89905363056d2858
Image attached to this post can be found here also with watermark intact: http://famosasbrasil.info/lolitinhas/452/
Images attached to this post and this postcan be found here: http://sakurama.ru/girl/angel/
The image attached to this post can be found on numerous web sites
The second picture attached to this post can be found here: http://christykitty.blogg.no/ (mid-way down, easy to miss)
The image attached to this post can also be found in numerous sites across the web. One site alluded to this picture being of former web porn girl "Zoey Model".
The image attached to this post can be found here: http://mscway.net/xxx4ar/151829/


Several of the pics on her thread I have not been able to find elsewhere, and some of them may well be hers, but too many of them appear to not be. Some of the pics are also posted to albums on her profile, and I have not gone through all of the pics on her profile.

swat
November 26th, 2011, 05:01 PM
Bloody hell. Thanks Ballarke, I'll have a good look at your post and links in the tomoz sometime. For now I'll just PM her and question it, also I'll delete her threads until we get to the bottom of it.

ballarke
November 26th, 2011, 05:27 PM
Let this be a lesson: If you try to post pics that come from elsewhere on the web, we will likely find out if we have reason to question what you've posted. And it doesn't matter how long you've been posting -- GothicQueen's thread was over 2 1/2 years old, I think.

ballarke
November 27th, 2011, 03:16 AM
Another user to report: BBWDominaUK (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=394721). This is not the first time I've reported this user.

In this post, three pics are presented.

The first picture came from here: http://www.bdsmi.com/gemma/index.html
The second picture came from here: http://weeklycrime.tumblr.com/day/2010/10/25 -- you can see the original watermark with the copyright statement


The third picture is so far eluding me, as are the new pics posted to the thread.

Now I mentioned that this isn't the first time I've called her out. If you look in the comments to this picture on Society (http://society.pichunter.com/php/photo.php?id=305307) which links back to this thread on the forum (http://forum.pichunter.com/showthread.php?p=1144860) (deleted thread, visible only by admins/mods), you will see that I call out a picture series she posted. So here is a person with a demonstrated history of posting pics they don't own continuing to post pics they down own.

swat
November 27th, 2011, 04:19 AM
Another user to report: BBWDominaUK (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=394721). This is not the first time I've reported this user.

In this post, three pics are presented.

The first picture came from here: http://www.bdsmi.com/gemma/index.html
The second picture came from here: http://weeklycrime.tumblr.com/day/2010/10/25 -- you can see the original watermark with the copyright statement


The third picture is so far eluding me, as are the new pics posted to the thread.

Now I mentioned that this isn't the first time I've called her out. If you look in the comments to this picture on Society (http://society.pichunter.com/php/photo.php?id=305307) which links back to this thread on the forum (http://forum.pichunter.com/showthread.php?p=1144860) (deleted thread, visible only by admins/mods), you will see that I call out a picture series she posted. So here is a person with a demonstrated history of posting pics they don't own continuing to post pics they down own.

Well that thread has gone, gonna go look at the rest later. As to her pics on that post, the second picture you mentioned still had the faint watermarks in the top left of it. So in my mind she's a fake and is gonna have to be spoken to or not and just banned.

swat
November 27th, 2011, 04:19 AM
Once again thank you buddy.

sexylauren
November 27th, 2011, 08:59 PM
omg was lauren a fake? She was REALLY popular here for so long. I never knew it turned out she was fake?

she and Claire were supposedly "friends". So how does that work if she was a fake - are both of them the same person???

:huh::huh:


ok wow i just seen this page goin on . im gona defend 96 percent of my photos as me and ok sum1 called me out on a few pics ...i got lazy and i got pregnant . the 1s i had posted that were not of me have been deleted . ive apoloigised on my thread ill apoligise to you guys that report people on here .

im sorry wont happen again
xxx lauren grace harvey

lukewanker
November 29th, 2011, 05:02 PM
ok wow i just seen this page goin on . im gona defend 96 percent of my photos as me and ok sum1 called me out on a few pics ...i got lazy and i got pregnant . the 1s i had posted that were not of me have been deleted . ive apoloigised on my thread ill apoligise to you guys that report people on here .

im sorry wont happen again
xxx lauren grace harvey

sorry, but the way you and claire the bit the head of some guy who accused you both of having fake pics says a lot.

tansrednab
December 2nd, 2011, 01:56 AM
There's a very easy way to prove you're real, Lauren: take a picture of yourself holding a sign that says "Pichunter Forum" with the current date on it. I hate to sound like a dick, but I find you very suspect. I would love to find out you're for real, so take a few quick minutes and prove it to us.

ballarke
December 2nd, 2011, 03:44 AM
Another user to call out: Joelmaster23 (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=496370)


Image from this post can be found here: http://perucaliente.net/2011/10/24/charito/charito-010/
Image from this post can be found here: http://jhonesealexsandra.blogspot.com/2011/01/blog-post_9593.html
Image from this post can be found here:
http://drchatgyi.blogspot.com/2011/05/blog-post_6736.html
Image from this post can be found here with watermark intact: http://cucciconnoisseur.tumblr.com/post/6161627420
Image from this post can be found here (and on other sites): http://forum.pichunter.com/showpost.php?p=1587274&postcount=289
Image from this post can be found here: http://www.dagens.dk/showthread.php/18002-Brunette-flasher-n%C3%B8gen-offentligt -- this at least shows it's a photo series not owned by the Joelmaster23


And I think this adequately shows that the user behind the moniker Joelmaster23 is posting images they do not own to the forum. I have not gone through all albums and threads, only their latest thread, but this does call everything else they've posted into question.

swat
December 2nd, 2011, 03:59 AM
Once again, well done mate.

ballarke
December 2nd, 2011, 04:01 AM
That was another profile for which I was suspicious, but as I said earlier in this thread, until I have evidence backing up my suspicions, I give them the benefit of the doubt.

swat
December 2nd, 2011, 04:02 AM
Same here. But thanks. I have already deleted his threads and PMed him to contact me regarding this matter.

ballarke
December 2nd, 2011, 09:22 PM
User: sexygal1 (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=72629)

Swat, your hunch is confirmed. It's a shame to have to report them given they've been on the forum for over 6 years. But if you're going to break the law, then it doesn't matter how long you've been here.


Several pictures came from this gallery (http://www.teenporngallery.net/sporty-girl/1124/index.html), namely the pics in these posts: here (both images), here (also both images), here
The picture on this post came from this web site (http://www.rudefinder.com/?lp=xfemale&ni=true) and is featured prominently on the homepage.
The pics in the following posts are from this gallery (http://www.penisbot.com/thumbs-5261900-marvelous-latina-chick-with-fine-boobs-and-ass-takes-off-her-silm-bra-and-panties-then-uses-dildo.html) featuring pornstar Jennesa Brazil (doesn't she have an account here?): here, here, here (first pic only, the remainder look like they're cut from a video, probably also of Jennesa)
The pic on this post came from a gallery you can find here (http://enriquesbeach.com/tgp/050609/images/) with the watermark in tact.


The rest of the pics I was not able to find elsewhere on the web and very well could be theirs. But, as I've pointed out, too many of them are not theirs.

swat
December 3rd, 2011, 04:55 AM
Your gonna have to tell me what software you use buddy.


Well he's been pm'ed and outed in his thread regarding this.

tansrednab
December 3rd, 2011, 11:36 PM
Damn, Ballarke. You are on some serious detective shit right now. Kudos!


...though it breaks my heart that Joelmaster is a fake. I really, really wanted her to be the real thing.

swat
December 4th, 2011, 05:03 AM
Well sexygal has deleted their own threads, after me posting on it, openly questioning the pictures in the thread (also PMed). Given 'BAD RESPONSES' as the reason for deletion.

So to me that enough proof. Thats another for the list.

swat
December 4th, 2011, 02:08 PM
Well 2 users I have contacted, have been on, but yet still have not contacted me about this. Will give them a few more days, then they will have to dealt with.

ballarke
December 4th, 2011, 11:09 PM
Posting in the Private section doesn't make you immune to call-out...

User: hot_amy (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=513285)


Picture in this post can be found on a multitude of sites on the web, including being featured on The Chive (http://thechive.com/2011/10/14/did-someone-lose-their-camera-38-photos/) (#22 in the gallery).
Picture in this post can be found on several web sites, including this Tumblr page (http://nicearse.tumblr.com/post/642235968/via-totaltease), this forum post (http://bentahan.com.ph/smf/index.php?topic=17.msg10447#msg10447), and this blog (http://thaiintelligentnews.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/thai-royalism-from-mountain-top-to-filthy-toilet-graffiti-when-will-the-royalist-learn-the-lesson/3p2qx4k-west-virginia-clarksburg-soledad-severin-sex-ad-5/)
Picture in this post can be found on this site (http://galleries2.adult-empire.com/8388/468253/1576/index.php).
Picture in this post can be found here (http://www.candidtease.com/galleries/gf-porn/hot-selfshot-wet-pussy-pics-by-a-smoking-hottie-girlfriend/hot-selfshot-wet-pussy-pics-by-a-smoking-hottie-girlfriend-005.php) with watermark in tact.
Picture in this post can be found here (http://las-mas-chulas.blogspot.com/2011/06/madurita-infiel.html?zx=2051aad65c70e585)
Picture in this post can be found on several sites and galleries
Picture in this post can be found on this page (http://www.ratemynaughty.com/2010/07/it-tastes-so-good-wanna-try/) (when the site decides to respond).
Picture in this post can be found here (http://whoresguide.in/2011/05/cute-gf-with-little-tight-cunt-spreading-her-pussy-lips/) or here (http://www.share-image.com/7667-russian-teen-amatuer-set).
Picture in this post can be found here (http://decolasensibleperohombrealfin.blogspot.com/2009/01/hermosa-criatura.html).


And I think that's enough, as that comprises most of the pictures in this thread. I've closed the thread with a link to this post. Swat, I'll let you take things from here.

swat
December 5th, 2011, 03:21 AM
I bet you have a template now for your posts here, dont ya ballarke. Just changing the links and username.


Oh well another one to contact.

CreamTease
December 5th, 2011, 03:47 AM
:bow::bow::thumbsup::thumbsup:

amazing to come on here and find ballarke and swat doing such a great job of clearing this place up!! Well done guys xxx

not only does it get rid of those you have publically outed but hopefully it makes the other fraudsters think twice.

There are some wonderful genuine people on this site and I'm glad we are kicking out the fakes! x

swat
December 5th, 2011, 04:53 AM
Oh looky here, more.


Here on claire_mckeena (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=10502&pictureid=132022) albums and here on wetlips21 (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=10513&pictureid=63494). If you look at the albums, there is a few the same in both. Both claiming they are their own.

Now we know Claire and Lauren are close friends. Lauren has openly said some pics she has posted are fake.
Now Claire has been questioned before about this by myself. In the past I have been satisfied with the answers I have been give. But now Im not so much.

blueyedvixen
December 5th, 2011, 06:49 AM
Lol wow.....not only are photos being stolen left and right, but it's totally obvious! In both albums they put two different girls, 4 total. I love how these idiots put different faces in their albums, threads etc.....then act like we are crazy when we point it out.

ballarke
December 5th, 2011, 11:16 AM
I bet you have a template now for your posts here, dont ya ballarke. Just changing the links and username.


Oh well another one to contact.

I will tonight. I'll probably make it a Google Docs form into which I can easily enter the information. Oddly I never thought to make any kind of template, but given how many are being found now, it's a good idea, and sad that so many are being found.

seanloves69
December 5th, 2011, 11:21 AM
madd love and respect to you guys thank you

ballarke
December 5th, 2011, 11:29 AM
:bow::bow::thumbsup::thumbsup:

amazing to come on here and find ballarke and swat doing such a great job of clearing this place up!! Well done guys xxx

not only does it get rid of those you have publically outed but hopefully it makes the other fraudsters think twice.

There are some wonderful genuine people on this site and I'm glad we are kicking out the fakes! x

It is definitely about keeping people honest. And we will afford you the benefit of the doubt always as we will not lay an accusation without evidence, as I have said already and will continue to say. It is not fair to the rest of us that we have some members posting pics from elsewhere on the web trying to masquerade them as their own. It's only the honest ones we want posting pics here.

FeistyChic
December 5th, 2011, 08:51 PM
i couldn't help but read this thread for a laugh (not at your expense) but only to see that the idiotic nature of these plagiarists doesn't go unnoticed. We've had a set stolen from another amateur sharing site (while on hiatus from PH) only to be put up in a random porn pic galleries. Though it was out of curiosity, i decided to enter in the actual album name into Google.... there they were. The idiots not only used the WHOLE album, but used the original album name as a description for their site!. Now, i've filled out a couple of google forms to take down a few of our albums, but out of frustration we haven't had the time to create a template (as ballarke was suggesting to do) to lessen the effort. We were going to re-post them here, but we're a bit reluctant to post them again due to loss of interest for that particular album. All we're waiting for now is someone to take those pics and claim them as there own.... and have them reported ASAP!


Thanks to the mods who keep this site real. :)

swat
December 6th, 2011, 02:27 AM
Well I have had a response from Joelmaster23.

He has confirmed that the pictures he has post are fake, BUT not all. He has request his account to be deleted. Which he will not get, he is to be branded a faker and banned

Thats another one gone.

ballarke
December 6th, 2011, 02:34 AM
Yeah I never said that all of them were not his. In fact there were several from his thread that came up with no hits in the investigation, so it's likely some of the pics he posted were legitimate. Unfortunately too many of them were not.

Good riddance I say. He didn't deserve the reputation level he had, as he cheated his way into it. At least he willingly owned up to what the evidence clearly showed, so he deserves some kudos for that, but it's still overwhelmingly overshadowed by the pics he stole and posted here.

Again, good riddance!

Well I have had a response from Joelmaster23.

He has confirmed that the pictures he has post are fake, BUT not all. He has request his account to be deleted.

Thats anothe one gone.

ballarke
December 6th, 2011, 03:39 AM
Now Claire has been questioned before about this by myself. In the past I have been satisfied with the answers I have been give. But now Im not so much.

Consider this a formal indictment of claire_mckeena, that is, unless her name in real life is Jessica Kristen.

Blog: Jessica Kristen (Dream Chaser) (http://jessicakristenxxx.blogspot.com/?zx=c26ac7fe5949b074)

Or Jessie D (http://imgfave.com/view/746748) (from this post)

And then there's the second pic from this post that I found in this gallery (http://www.nakedneighbour.com/various-yummy-pussies-finger-fucked-517159) (I think you'll find another pic in this gallery looking familiar). I think a few from this post came from there, too.

The first pic in that post can be seen here (http://www.holatu.com/public/user/gallery/view/name_rutty/id_215877/page_4/) among several other sites

The third pic in this post likely came from here (http://whatboyswant.com/forum_read/5054330), but is on other sites as well. The second pic is just a rotated version of an earlier picture. The first pic likely came from here (http://latestvogue.blogspot.com/2009/12/new.html).

The pics in this post can be found in so many place it's not even funny....

And she apparently posted identical pics just rotated in different directions. See pics 2 and 3 on this post for details (rotate one of them 180 degrees and you have the other).

The pictures in this post came from here (http://imgsrc.ru/dansloo/16931964.html#bp) (among a myriad of other sites) and here (http://dbbians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=105257) (with watermark!), respectively.

And that's all I'm gonna do. That's going through most of the posts she made to that thread. And every post with attachments that's run through a search comes up with hits. It's been the case with all but maybe one or two posts. Do you need anything more than this?

Claire hasn't been on the forum since June, and it doesn't look like she's been banned, I think this more than declares that she needs to be. I've closed the thread with a link to this post.

* * * * *

And for my next indictment, I'll be targeting sexylauren. Stay tuned... you won't want to miss that!

swat
December 6th, 2011, 04:17 AM
Loving this.

swat
December 6th, 2011, 04:40 AM
You can find a hell a lot of 'Claire's' pic's here (http://forum.ns4w.org/showthread.php?t=43284), or like Ballarke said 'or is it Jessie?'.

VirtualAdept
December 6th, 2011, 06:27 AM
And for my next indictment, I'll be targeting sexylauren. Stay tuned... you won't want to miss that!


Is there much point, since she's admitted and apologised for doing it?

ballarke
December 6th, 2011, 11:19 AM
Is there much point, since she's admitted and apologised for doing it?

Let's just say I have reason to believe she's still not being entirely honest...

VirtualAdept
December 6th, 2011, 11:22 AM
Let's just say I have reason to believe she's still not being entirely honest...

Fair do's cap'n :)

tansrednab
December 6th, 2011, 11:49 AM
I have full sets downloaded from somewhere or other of at least two of the girls Claire claims to be. I was really suspicious when she started posting pictures from the one set, then she switched to the other and I knew for sure she was a complete fake.

megajugs
December 6th, 2011, 12:56 PM
why do these people do it ? it as to be more than just reputaion points, i mean if you are a woman doing it and the men chat leave comments etc it cant do nothing for you as they aint complimenting you its someone else ??? :bash:

hyvolts69
December 6th, 2011, 01:11 PM
why do these people do it ? it as to be more than just reputaion points, i mean if you are a woman doing it and the men chat leave comments etc it cant do nothing for you as they aint complimenting you its someone else ??? :bash:

I think there are a lot of guys out there who get off on posing as girls to get other guys who would not normally be interested, pay them any attention.

P.S. I was sad to see you remove your pics. Thank you for sharing them while you did.

blueyedvixen
December 6th, 2011, 01:27 PM
A lot of these fakes will admit and apologize after you hound them long enough and enough people point it out....sexylauren did that and there are still two different faces on hers that she claims are her. They do that to get the attention off them and to earn "honest points" gimme a damn break, these people THINK they are slick and that we are stupid.

megajugs
December 6th, 2011, 01:28 PM
never thought of it that way, but how can a gay/bi guy posing as a woman get off on a man talking to them as it they are a woman,:confused: i think they would be better suited going on a site that caters for them :help:

FeistyChic
December 6th, 2011, 02:56 PM
never thought of it that way, but how can a gay/bi guy posing as a woman get off on a man talking to them as it they are a woman,:confused: i think they would be better suited going on a site that caters for them :help:
i had thought the same thing. why would you pose as someone else (gender) in order to get a response/attention from another? Like megajugs said, it make more sense for them to post in an apt website for that. Still struggling to find how you can get satisfaction from lying like that. i feel these people have some insecurity issues and think they have nothing real to offer... which they do and should do so in the right manner. we'd rather be acknowledged for something we've got... not something you're not.

axeman
December 6th, 2011, 05:25 PM
this is like CSI ...lol

blueyedvixen
December 6th, 2011, 06:20 PM
A lot of these fakes will admit and apologize after you hound them long enough and enough people point it out....sexylauren did that and there are still two different faces on hers that she claims are her. They do that to get the attention off them and to earn "honest points" gimme a damn break, these people THINK they are slick and that we are stupid.

I'd like to correct myself as SEXYLAUREN has added back a lot of those fake pics.....she has up to 10 different FACES in her albums claiming they are all her!!! I'm sorry, I know all the guys like her but she's obviously fake.....just because all the girls have bleach blonde hair doesn't mean they are the same person....all you have to do is LOOK and it's obvious.

Shadows69
December 6th, 2011, 08:43 PM
Hrmm....props again to the mods for all the hard work at keeping this site free of fakers... Can't help but wonder though if there are that many people posting fake pictures as their own on PH, that there are also just as many (hopefully not) taking PH pictures and reposting somewheres else on the net. What would be the best course of action to follow if "we" find ourselves on another site? Hasn't happened to us yet, but not really sure which direction to go in this type of event.

ballarke
December 6th, 2011, 09:05 PM
It is certainly a valid concern, Shadows, and whenever I investigate a user, I do try to take that into account. There is one user -- I won't call them out -- who has a lot of pics posted to this forum that I did find elsewhere. All of the pictures did appear to go together as one group, but there were some key pictures from the group that I could not find on other web sites during the investigation, so I called it and am giving that user the benefit of the doubt.

However when we call someone out, we do give you the opportunity to defend yourself. If you believe yourself to be the victim of copyright theft, then certainly you can use that as your defense, but you do need to provide some evidence supporting it, and if you do use this as your defense, we will request of you evidence supporting your assertion.

But that is why I go to great lengths to find these pics on the web. If I'm going to accuse someone of posting pics they don't own, I want that to be supported by clear and convincing evidence, something against which the person cannot really raise a defense. If I have any doubts about my ability to establish that the person does not own a particular picture, I won't call that picture out -- and I don't. If I can only find one or two pictures of many on other web sites, I will call out those pics only but not the user.

And I definitely share your concern as I find more and more people: is it more likely the amateur pics are being taken by the web sites from here, or more likely the people are are taking the pics from the web sites? It's a difficult question to answer, but I do try to take dates into account. If it appears a pic has been cropped, I try to find the entire original.

But all in all, I do my best to give the users here the benefit of any doubt. After all, I'd expect the same of myself, so I'd best give it to others.

Hrmm....props again to the mods for all the hard work at keeping this site free of fakers... Can't help but wonder though if there are that many people posting fake pictures as their own on PH, that there are also just as many (hopefully not) taking PH pictures and reposting somewheres else on the net. What would be the best course of action to follow if "we" find ourselves on another site? Hasn't happened to us yet, but not really sure which direction to go in this type of event.

blueyedvixen
December 6th, 2011, 09:22 PM
I'm all for giving someone the benefit of the doubt but when you have 10 different faces and you are claiming them as your own, THAT is evidence enough that you are posting fake pics and you should be banned.....those NUDE photos belong to SOMEONE!!!

swat
December 7th, 2011, 02:47 AM
I'd like to correct myself as SEXYLAUREN has added back a lot of those fake pics.....she has up to 10 different FACES in her albums claiming they are all her!!! I'm sorry, I know all the guys like her but she's obviously fake.....just because all the girls have bleach blonde hair doesn't mean they are the same person....all you have to do is LOOK and it's obvious.

Well after a week of waiting, and her being on a few times. She has been dealt with. Album gone and her threads. all with a good ass tanning

swat
December 7th, 2011, 04:02 AM
Given how long this person has been posting, it pains me to have to do this, but I must call out GothicQueen (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=338552). I've had a sneaking suspicion that she was not entirely genuine, so in doing some image searches of the pictures she's posted to this forum, I think I've confirmed it.


Well she has been given her time, and she has been on at least twice since. No contact.

So thats her dealt with.

blueyedvixen
December 7th, 2011, 01:55 PM
Well after a week of waiting, and her being on a few times. She has been dealt with. Album gone and her threads. all with a good ass tanning

I want an ass tanning hehe but leave my albums and threads alone please lol

kooriusgeorge
December 8th, 2011, 03:21 AM
Very impressive work. Honest PHers appreciate your efforts.

Lizard69uk
December 8th, 2011, 02:30 PM
This is a great forum. I was in two minds of whether to leave here or not, due to the amount of fake profiles on here. After being on a couple of other adult sites and running my own, I can inform you of quite a few fakes. I would need to research them again as I removed them from my friends list.
Lauren seems to be an extremely popular name for a fake profile. What's funny is I had a conversation with someone on another site with the same name and the same photos and no matter what I said to people they did not want to believe that she was fake. I think men get sucked in to this outer life experience thinking that they are talking to the person in the image. I was a little confused when I told Lauren on both sites that someone was using her pictures and neither of them were bothered by it. I think if anyone was pretending to be yourself and using your own photos you would be a little annoyed. Also one of them was from Australia and hated English girls and the other was confused about what part of England she was from. lol.
It would be great to know who the real person in those pictures is!
I will try and find the many names I have removed from my friends list because I found out they were fake and I will get back to you.
I am considering starting up a wanted section on my own site to find out who the real people in the photos are. lol.

As for Claire_mckeena, well her photos are popping up all over the net under different profile names on different sites, sometimes the same photos are popping up under different names on the same sites and nothing is done about it. Apparently she lives in many places around the world. Lucky girl.

I had a sneeky suspicion about greame11 too, but that user is no longer on here anymore. At least I can not find them anyway.

VirtualAdept
December 9th, 2011, 04:27 PM
Ballarke, is there any chance you could lemme know what you're using to find the images? I've got a hunch and I wanna look into it, but tineye is being less than accomadating

ballarke
December 9th, 2011, 05:12 PM
PM me the user in question

VirtualAdept
December 9th, 2011, 05:26 PM
Thats no fun... I was gonna use it as summat to do in the small hours at work lol

ballarke
December 9th, 2011, 08:40 PM
VirtualAdept sent me two usernames: 757fm and candybabe. The first has already been called out in their own thread. I haven't gone through their albums yet, but I have little doubt I'll find something.

That leaves candybabe.
Thread: my first post hope you like and it gets you hard a bitit

This post has only 1 attachment that I cannot locate anywhere.

This post has three attachments:


Attachment #1: http://www.blog-adultes.com/voyeurisme/jaime-mexhiber-sur-blog-adulte/]This blog post
Attachment #2: being rather difficult to find elsewhere. Could be a legit pic.
Attachment #3: This blog post (http://www.amateurvideosfree.com/2010/10/loirinha-com-uns-peitos-maravilhosos.html) -- third row, first image


The attachment in this post appears to be a frame from a video. Not sure where it came from, though, but doubt it's candybabe.

I have not gone through her albums yet.

ballarke
December 11th, 2011, 12:35 AM
User: 757fm (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=501592)
Album: "news (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=27205)"

This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=27205&pictureid=225702&page=4) comes from a gallery for "Milena D" at Met-Art (http://hosted.met-art.com/Full_met-art_EKL_12_691/lite.php?pa=1378812), namely the picture was identified as being cropped from the picture on the top-right of the gallery

This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=27205&pictureid=225698&page=2) comes from here (http://nakedhipster.com/euro-trash-gets-naked-in-london-bathroom/), with original watermark.

comes from [url=http://www.artnudegalleries.com/nude-angel-pics/1918/index.html%22]this gallery (]This picture[/url), also with original watermark.

This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=27205&pictureid=225697) has already been called out.

The other pictures from the album I cannot find online, so it is possible they are legitimate.

I'll look through the other albums when I get a chance.

swat
December 11th, 2011, 04:21 AM
Call them out buddy.

ballarke
December 11th, 2011, 05:04 PM
I removed three attachments from bespin's (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=462585) thread "Let's talk" as I was able to find them on other websites:

Original post: attachment could be found elsewhere on the Internet and comes up with dozens of results. Full-size image shows a brunette.
Original post: attachment could also be found on dozens of other websites (including this one (http://www.bustynympha.com/gallery/big-tits/6295f334b984c95a82acd515d334c713/index.html)) and appears to be linked with the site "LostBush.com". Date on image from site found: Feb 24, 2011. This picture is currently in her album as well (for now).
Original post: she claimed the attachment was her in panties, but it was cropped from a picture of a girl called Monica Asario (http://www.reinashi5.net/2011/11/monica-asario.html)


Oddly and intriguingly, these three attachments all had the same filename: "Untitled.jpg". There are three other attachments bearing the same filename that may not be hers either, but I haven't been able to establish that.

The remaining pictures may well be hers, and I found a gallery on xhamster.com showing quite a few of the pics she has posted here. But that site allows people to upload their own pictures, so I'm not calling that into question. I have not evaluated her albums yet.

Hersheyhighway
December 11th, 2011, 05:05 PM
Bookem Dano ..:D

Rell01
December 11th, 2011, 10:27 PM
I removed three attachments from bespin's (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=462585) thread "Let's talk" as I was able to find them on other websites:

Original post: attachment could be found elsewhere on the Internet and comes up with dozens of results. Full-size image shows a brunette.
Original post: attachment could also be found on dozens of other websites (including this one (http://www.bustynympha.com/gallery/big-tits/6295f334b984c95a82acd515d334c713/index.html)) and appears to be linked with the site "LostBush.com". Date on image from site found: Feb 24, 2011. This picture is currently in her album as well (for now).
Original post: she claimed the attachment was her in panties, but it was cropped from a picture of a girl called Monica Asario (http://www.reinashi5.net/2011/11/monica-asario.html)


Oddly and intriguingly, these three attachments all had the same filename: "Untitled.jpg". There are three other attachments bearing the same filename that may not be hers either, but I haven't been able to establish that.

The remaining pictures may well be hers, and I found a gallery on xhamster.com showing quite a few of the pics she has posted here. But that site allows people to upload their own pictures, so I'm not calling that into question. I have not evaluated her albums yet.

I've noticed some on her society page that are of Keyra Augustinas ass that she claims as hers.

sexlovehoney
December 12th, 2011, 03:39 AM
I've noticed some on her society page that are of Keyra Augustinas ass that she claims as hers.

Wow, that's bold considering how popular Keyra is.

ballarke
December 12th, 2011, 03:46 AM
Wow, that's bold considering how popular Keyra is.

That's probably why the threads don't exist on PHF anymore.

CreamTease
December 12th, 2011, 02:19 PM
I removed three attachments from bespin's (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=462585) thread "Let's talk" as I was able to find them on other websites:

Original post: attachment could be found elsewhere on the Internet and comes up with dozens of results. Full-size image shows a brunette.
Original post: attachment could also be found on dozens of other websites (including this one (http://www.bustynympha.com/gallery/big-tits/6295f334b984c95a82acd515d334c713/index.html)) and appears to be linked with the site "LostBush.com". Date on image from site found: Feb 24, 2011. This picture is currently in her album as well (for now).
Original post: she claimed the attachment was her in panties, but it was cropped from a picture of a girl called Monica Asario (http://www.reinashi5.net/2011/11/monica-asario.html)


Oddly and intriguingly, these three attachments all had the same filename: "Untitled.jpg". There are three other attachments bearing the same filename that may not be hers either, but I haven't been able to establish that.

The remaining pictures may well be hers, and I found a gallery on xhamster.com showing quite a few of the pics she has posted here. But that site allows people to upload their own pictures, so I'm not calling that into question. I have not evaluated her albums yet.

In the past she posted a really stunning photo that I asked for details of how she had done it. What she old me didnt add up so I went hunting and found the photo on another site (from several years ago where she had said she took it the previous weekend with her new camera). She admitted to me that some of the more recent photos were not her (this was about a year ago?) as she had got bored of taking them. Someone else had questioned her validity too and at that point she removed her photos and disappeared for a while.

Seems she is back to the same tricks...

ballarke
December 13th, 2011, 02:35 AM
Seems she is back to the same tricks...

Agreed.

In going back through a lot of the pics of hers in her deleted threads (many of the pictures are still available on Society), I'm finding a lot of pics that were just downloaded, cropped and reposted. In one instance, she took a picture from the site "Obsession Art" called "Backlit Blonde (http://www.obsessionart.com/product.asp?pf_id=mp_MP074&geord=1)" and posted it to the forum as if it were a picture she took. The original image on the website is dated 2006. Bespin posted it here in January 2011.

She posted a very shrunk down picture of Elin Nordegren, took a picture of a woman from Bogata and cropped it down to just her pussy and the bottom of a red neglige and posted that, and there's another pic with a watermark for a website.

Many of the pics very well could be hers, such as all of the pics that are mirror self-shots. But there is plenty of evidence that she has and is posting pics to the forum that are clearly not hers.

CreamTease
December 13th, 2011, 03:21 AM
Agreed.

In going back through a lot of the pics of hers in her deleted threads (many of the pictures are still available on Society), I'm finding a lot of pics that were just downloaded, cropped and reposted. In one instance, she took a picture from the site "Obsession Art" called "Backlit Blonde (http://www.obsessionart.com/product.asp?pf_id=mp_MP074&geord=1)" and posted it to the forum as if it were a picture she took. The original image on the website is dated 2006. Bespin posted it here in January 2011.

She posted a very shrunk down picture of Elin Nordegren, took a picture of a woman from Bogata and cropped it down to just her pussy and the bottom of a red neglige and posted that, and there's another pic with a watermark for a website.

Many of the pics very well could be hers, such as all of the pics that are mirror self-shots. But there is plenty of evidence that she has and is posting pics to the forum that are clearly not hers.

if you want a copy of the mail where she admits to posting photos that arent hers then just shout x

swat
December 13th, 2011, 03:40 AM
I'll have a copy pls CT.

Then I think that will be the final nail in her coffin.

ozfornication
December 13th, 2011, 05:27 AM
Curious how the picture recognition works as someone with teenage boys we have tried to limit our photos so that identification would not be easy. But you seem to be able to take a shot of just one body part and end up with the original photo.
I guess it is a bit like the software used in tracking plagarism or students copying assignments if it is already on the web you are just comparing what is out there to what is at hand.
.

You are doing an excellent job.:bow:

VirtualAdept
December 13th, 2011, 05:39 AM
tbh id still like to know so I can protect my 'normal' photography and bill those using it without permission.

ballarke
December 13th, 2011, 12:43 PM
I'm continually amazed at the ease the latest image search technologies have provided with finding these pictures on the web. Full images from cropped versions, sometimes the original intact watermark, not even adjusting the brightness of the pic or changing it to black and white will hide it either as I've still caught people who have tried that.

And as the search and comparison algorithms keep improving, the people intent on posting pics that are not their own will be getting caught quicker and quicker.

Now this also serves another purpose as well. Not only does it allow us to catch the fakers, but in the pornstar fan areas, people post links to pics or galleries wanting help in identifying an actress. Well it comes in handy there as well.

Curious how the picture recognition works as someone with teenage boys we have tried to limit our photos so that identification would not be easy. But you seem to be able to take a shot of just one body part and end up with the original photo.
I guess it is a bit like the software used in tracking plagarism or students copying assignments if it is already on the web you are just comparing what is out there to what is at hand.
.

You are doing an excellent job.:bow:

swat
December 14th, 2011, 05:29 AM
Well I have been contacted by 757fm.

She has admitted to the fakery of some of the picture's she has posted to her album.

Well, see you later missy.

ballarke
December 14th, 2011, 11:37 AM
How's the investigation with bespin?

swat
December 14th, 2011, 02:28 PM
Sorry, forgot to post the result.


CT passed on the info she had. She's now banned.

CreamTease
December 14th, 2011, 02:32 PM
Sorry, forgot to post the result.


CT passed on the info she had. She's now banned.

just to clarify - he means bespin is banned!

not me :D

( I was worried for a second myself!)

x

swat
December 14th, 2011, 02:33 PM
Sorry CT, ye bespin has been banned.

ballarke
December 14th, 2011, 03:16 PM
Sorry CT, ye bespin has been banned.

I deleted her thread as well. I'm really starting to hate how many of these we are finding now. But what can ya do other than ban them when they're found?

swat
December 14th, 2011, 03:56 PM
Nothing we can do, at the end of the day its against the law and we could get shut down for it.

Oh and thanks for the thread deletion, I forgot about that.

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 12:01 AM
Nothing we can do, at the end of the day its against the law and we could get shut down for it.

I know... I know... and that's what I keep telling myself. I mean we've banned several members recently who've been posting regularly to the forum, in a couple cases for a couple years -- bespin was one hell of an example.

And unfortunately now I must call out another member who has been posting fairly regularly for the last couple years and has also achieved 4 dots to their reputation: ambulance (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=392321). I'll post the details and lock their threads as soon as I have the details prepared. This one looks like a similar profile to bespin as well -- some pics are definitely not theirs, but some very well might be.

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 12:44 AM
Follow-up: here's the evidence against ambulance. These are album pics, so they are pics they could very easily delete, but I've got screenshots that I've attached below just in case they try something. All of these were found for just 1 album and this isn't all of the pics in that album -- I gave up after this many as this is definitely plenty.

Web site: http://www.poringa.net/posts/imagenes/1865733/Fotos-amateur-robadas-_Imperdible_--_F.html


http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=231082
http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=231081
http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=202635 (inverted)
http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=202634
http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=202637 (inverted)


Web site: http://www.poringa.net/posts/imagenes/1779623/Tarde-Fea_-Emo-Linda.html


http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=208038


Web site: http://chanarchive.org/4chan/soc/14825


http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=230429
http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=230428
http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=230425
http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=230426
http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=230427


Web site: http://www.portalnet.cl/comunidad/cementerio-de-temas.635/101472-my-amateur-teens-only-thread-updated-daily-5.html#post2580473


http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=194753


Web site: http://www.elpenetraidor.com/amateur/autofotos-de-una-rubia-jovencita-esta-delgadita-un-buen-remedio-comer-buenas-pollas/


http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=169661
http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=169660
http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=21533&pictureid=199466


And that's enough for now. This points out clearly that most of ambulance's pictures are not their own. We have a mixture of brunettes and blonds from all across the Internet and the world.

Ambulance is currently under a 7-day ban while we sort this out, just to keep the albums from going anywhere.

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 12:52 AM
And I have also called gwalito (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=449435) into question, as I've said in this post, as I found a good number of the pictures posted to that thread on the website Stafina.fr (http://www.stafina.fr).

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 01:37 AM
And unless CT35's (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=157821) real name is Lisa Neils (http://www.freeones.com/html/l_links/Lisa_Neils/), she's got a ton of stolen pics in her albums (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?u=157821). I've got screenshots of her albums as well. She was committed, modifying brightness and contrast levels (giving sense of overexposure) along with cropping them -- and in two of the pics actually blurred them. But I was still able to find the originals in almost all cases, including the blurred pics.

The link to freeones above provides a lot of galleries where you can find the pictures she downloaded and modified before posting to her albums here. It doesn't look like she's ever had any threads in Female Nudes on this forum.

I've put CT35 under a 7-day ban as well while we sort this out to keep the pics from going anywhere.

CreamTease
December 15th, 2011, 03:23 AM
OMG. I love the ambulance photos :( Such a shame if they have been adding ones of other people.

And CT35 is REALLY popular. :(

BUT I think you are doing a great job and this NEEDS to be done as it not only gets rid of those people you find who are faking but deters others from doing the same.

Ballarke - if you go check me out (;)) I am on three other sites as CreamTease and some of my photos are on another site under one other name (they already had a CreamTease - grr) if you find them anywhere else I WANT TO KNOW!!!!

Have to tell you though - I might go get rid of the photos from the other sites as I havent been on them in over a year and laving photos hanging around seems to be asking for trouble

xx

swat
December 15th, 2011, 04:41 AM
CT35

Looking at CT35 and her albums, they seem consistent. So either she's a complete fake or she is Lisa Neils.

I'd lift her ban or wait for it to be up, then PM her and see what she says.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ambulance

Inconsistencies says FAKE to me. But we have to give them time to defend them selves.

So same again, Pm and wait for them to get back to you/me.

swat
December 15th, 2011, 06:26 AM
Im calling out SBBabe (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=490721). Checked a couple of her pic's and multipul hit on many different album and site's.

swat
December 15th, 2011, 10:43 AM
Has 757fm been in touch yet ballarke?

Has had few days and have been on each day since I tried to contact them.

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 10:45 AM
Has 757fm been in touch yet ballarke?

Has had few days and have been on each day since I tried to contact them.

Nope, she hasn't sent me anything. I thought she already pm'd you to say that she knowingly used images she didn't own, or at least that is what you seemed to say earlier in this thread.

swat
December 15th, 2011, 10:52 AM
Sorry was typing and reading on different pages at the same time, not the best thing to be doing.

Was meant to have asked about Claire, has she been in touch since last week.

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 10:59 AM
She hasn't been on the forum since June and I never sen her any PM or anything. I can try contacting her, but I'm doubtful I'll get anything from her.

swat
December 15th, 2011, 11:00 AM
And unless CT35's (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=157821) real name is Lisa Neils (http://www.freeones.com/html/l_links/Lisa_Neils/), she's got a ton of stolen pics in her albums (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?u=157821). I've got screenshots of her albums as well. She was committed, modifying brightness and contrast levels (giving sense of overexposure) along with cropping them -- and in two of the pics actually blurred them. But I was still able to find the originals in almost all cases, including the blurred pics.

The link to freeones above provides a lot of galleries where you can find the pictures she downloaded and modified before posting to her albums here. It doesn't look like she's ever had any threads in Female Nudes on this forum.

I've put CT35 under a 7-day ban as well while we sort this out to keep the pics from going anywhere.

Im calling out SBBabe (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=490721). Checked a couple of her pic's and multipul hit on many different album and site's.

Ok I have just been told somthing I didnt know. These two are one and the same person.

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 11:46 AM
I was skeptical of SBbabe as well, though I'm not thrilled to see my suspicions confirmed. I'd be interested to know how you learned those two are the same person.

swat
December 15th, 2011, 11:47 AM
I was skeptical of SBbabe as well, though I'm not thrilled to see my suspicions confirmed. I'd be interested to know how you learned those two are the same person.

I have my means, I have my means buddy :innocent:

VirtualAdept
December 15th, 2011, 12:30 PM
I know its disheartening finding so many of these fakers, guys, but as has been said, its genuinely appreciated by the honest posters.
Good work. If I can be of any help, I'm nearly always willing :P

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 01:40 PM
And it looks like gwalito just pled guilty to the charges by clearing out their profile -- deleting all albums, friends and visitor messages. What do you think swat?

swat
December 15th, 2011, 02:17 PM
Looks like it, I just deleted threads

CreamTease
December 15th, 2011, 02:29 PM
I am so glad you are doing this

but God its depressing to see people you thought were genuine well established well liked members of the site - turn out to be deceiving people with photos.

Still glad you are doing it. But why cant it just be the bitches aor the ones who dont ever talk!

:(

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 02:39 PM
Looks like it, I just deleted threads

All that's left then is to ban the account and zero out the rep rating. I don't mind moving up the rep rankings, but not like this...

swat
December 15th, 2011, 02:41 PM
Tell me about it, its not the best way. I'll go sort the rest of it out now.

dimples
December 15th, 2011, 03:54 PM
I'm 100% real boys and girls...my tits...my ass..my pussy....and my tat's...ALL ME...all the time...:D

CreamTease
December 15th, 2011, 04:19 PM
And it looks like gwalito just pled guilty to the charges by clearing out their profile -- deleting all albums, friends and visitor messages. What do you think swat?

be aware that their photos are still posted in other peoples threads eg http://forum.pichunter.com/showthread.php?p=1322941#post1322941

xx

lukewanker
December 15th, 2011, 04:43 PM
Ok I have just been told somthing I didnt know. These two are one and the same person.

Would love to know how you found this out... take it the ip address of users is logged and came up the same?

strange they went to the trouble of having a conversation with themselves!

http://forum.pichunter.com/converse.sphp?u=490721&u2=157821

schism666
December 15th, 2011, 06:01 PM
After reading this terrifying thread, the missus and I have decided to delete our threads and will no longer be posting pics here. Just as easy stolen pics can be posted here from other sites, the opposite could happen and that's just not cool. Not saying goodbye, just saying it's too easy to steal and we will be keeping our pics for our own use. :grin2:

dimples
December 15th, 2011, 06:19 PM
After reading this terrifying thread, the missus and I have decided to delete our threads and will no longer be posting pics here. Just as easy stolen pics can be posted here from other sites, the opposite could happen and that's just not cool. Not saying goodbye, just saying it's too easy to steal and we will be keeping our pics for our own use. :grin2:

This is where the sad part comes in play....the honest posters feel cheated and afraid they will have their pics stolen....this has become a horrible situation when members don't feel comfortable posting their pics

axeman
December 15th, 2011, 07:10 PM
i for one don't understand why one would even post a pic that is'nt theres... thats like me posting pics of Brad Pitt ... lol ... Even thou i do look just like him when the lights are out ...lol
even thou i don't have any pics posted here anymore every one i ever did was taken with my camera or my phone ... and whom ever was in the pic with me was 100% ok with the pics being a taken and posted ... we mostly took the pics for fun and the heat of the moment and felt like sharing them ... thats my 2 cents on the subject ...

artofsplatter
December 15th, 2011, 07:15 PM
After reading this terrifying thread, the missus and I have decided to delete our threads and will no longer be posting pics here. Just as easy stolen pics can be posted here from other sites, the opposite could happen and that's just not cool. Not saying goodbye, just saying it's too easy to steal and we will be keeping our pics for our own use. :grin2:

That's no good, please don't go!!!!!
- Dimples you're totally right, that's too bad. :(

TheWhskys
December 15th, 2011, 07:17 PM
Wow! I am shocked at this and speechless!

CT35 really hurts...she/he/whoever had really come across as an awesome person.

Thank you to the mods for calling these fakes out! E and I post our pics here, knowing we don't have perfect bodies, because we love sharing our sexual side. So for someone to have such low self-esteem to steal someone elses pics just to boost their confidence....wow.

artofsplatter
December 15th, 2011, 07:22 PM
Wow! I am shocked at this and speechless!

CT35 really hurts...she/he/whoever had really come across as an awesome person.

Thank you to the mods for calling these fakes out! E and I post our pics here, knowing we don't have perfect bodies, because we love sharing our sexual side. So for someone to have such low self-esteem to steal someone elses pics just to boost their confidence....wow.

....Let's be real, you both have perfect bodies!!!! ;)

I drink beer, and I have a GREAT time. :)

axeman
December 15th, 2011, 07:25 PM
you two are awesome!!!!

Wow! I am shocked at this and speechless!

CT35 really hurts...she/he/whoever had really come across as an awesome person.

Thank you to the mods for calling these fakes out! E and I post our pics here, knowing we don't have perfect bodies, because we love sharing our sexual side. So for someone to have such low self-esteem to steal someone elses pics just to boost their confidence....wow.

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 08:13 PM
I've PM'd ambulance and CT35 and lifted their bans so they can respond. We'll see what they say.

Hersheyhighway
December 15th, 2011, 08:33 PM
i for one don't understand why one would even post a pic that is'nt theres... thats like me posting pics of Brad Pitt ... lol ... Even thou i do look just like him when the lights are out ...lol
even thou i don't have any pics posted here anymore every one i ever did was taken with my camera or my phone ... and whom ever was in the pic with me was 100% ok with the pics being a taken and posted ... we mostly took the pics for fun and the heat of the moment and felt like sharing them ... thats my 2 cents on the subject ...

I think its people who are not happy with the way they look,but want the attention from other users.It really is shocking to see the one's that have posted fakes.I would hate to see the honest people stop posting in fear of them being stolen and used on other sites.

dedimm
December 15th, 2011, 09:35 PM
Seeing as how Schism666 made note of the reverse happening, people taking pics from PH, maybe you mods should allow pics posted here to have a "pichunter" watermark then it's not so easy to steal/use them elsewhere.

ballarke
December 15th, 2011, 09:37 PM
Maybe you mods should allow pics posted here to have a "pichunter" watermark then it's not so easy to take pics from here.

Sure it'd be. It'd be just like a lot of the pics that get quite a few people in trouble: just crop out the watermark. Few would tolerate having a watermark in the middle of the pic.

CreamTease
December 16th, 2011, 03:03 AM
To be fair I think there are a number of reasons people post photos which arent theirs.

The worst are those who do it to decieve and pretend to be a woman when they arent - the reasons escape me why anyone would do this.

Some do it for low self esteem as Hershey says. And how sad that they should feel so bad about themselves thy feel they have to use someone else's body to get attention.

And some do it to supplement their own photos. Sometimes this might be to show parts they dont want to show on themselves (not quite sure WHY it would be better for people to imagine its your pussy then to see your real pussy....)

But sometimes too I suspect (and have heard) its because people get caught up in getting the attention and dont have time to go take enough photos or imagination to think of new ones. So they take them from elsewhere to fill the gaps. I know I feel bad when I am reposting photos from a while back but there isnt always time to take new photos.

None of these are GOOD reasons for taking someone elses photos and EVERYONE should be stopped from doing it. I guess I am just saying that some of these people might still be nice people. It's only those doing it to get a kick out of the deception who deserve rocks throwing at them!

Maybe I am feeling full of Christmas spirit!! :D

xx

ballarke
December 16th, 2011, 09:18 AM
I don't doubt that these are nice people acting with otherwise good intentions. Well most of them, that is. Unfortunately the rules are how they are, and so is the law.

Bespin definitely supplemented her photos, as did a couple of the others who were caught. I understand the desire behind it, but it's not just copyright infringement, it's also plagiarism and it is unethical and immoral. And in the real world an otherwise honest person who plagiarizes just once can find themselves without their livelihood, regardless of the reasons for doing it.

Why they are intentionally deceiving the others on this forum is something we can debate till the sun explodes, but it's irrelevant. We are concerned only that the rules were broken, not necessarily why, especially when we are talking about the kind of rule breaking that could result in the forum going away. That's not something I want to see happen, and I'm sure no one else does either (well except maybe those who got banned because they got caught).

ballarke
December 18th, 2011, 12:39 AM
Ambulance has confessed to what they have done and deleted all of their albums. Unfortunately that still means they must and have been banned permanently.

swat
December 18th, 2011, 04:15 AM
Anything from Jennyb yet, I think her time is up

throatsoaker
December 18th, 2011, 01:01 PM
wow thats crazy stuff! just joined ph and havent gotten any pics up yet! makes me a bit scetchy! i have made 4 friends but one is my wife. it makes you wonder who you can trust! i not sayin i wont make friends, i enjoy the conversation and meeting new people. but i may not post photos for a while sorry! but at same time i dont want people to think im a perv either( seeing pics and not posting in return)! as far as why people do it this could be as simple as a fm being 350 pds or m with lil 1 gettin pos attn

ballarke
December 18th, 2011, 03:19 PM
Anything from Jennyb yet, I think her time is up

I'm giving her till tomorrow. If there isn't anything from her by the time I'm having lunch tomorrow, then she's going to be banned. She hasn't been on since yesterday morning (my time zone), so hopefully we'll have something from her soon.

ballarke
December 19th, 2011, 07:31 PM
Swat, I noticed this user is still on the forum. Did you ever discuss this issue with that user?

Another user to report: BBWDominaUK (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=394721). This is not the first time I've reported this user.

In this post, three pics are presented.

The first picture came from here: http://www.bdsmi.com/gemma/index.html
The second picture came from here: http://weeklycrime.tumblr.com/day/2010/10/25 -- you can see the original watermark with the copyright statement


The third picture is so far eluding me, as are the new pics posted to the thread.

Now I mentioned that this isn't the first time I've called her out. If you look in the comments to this picture on Society (http://society.pichunter.com/php/photo.php?id=305307) which links back to this thread on the forum (http://forum.pichunter.com/showthread.php?p=1144860) (deleted thread, visible only by admins/mods), you will see that I call out a picture series she posted. So here is a person with a demonstrated history of posting pics they don't own continuing to post pics they down own.

TheWhskys
December 19th, 2011, 09:02 PM
Wondering if anyone has heard from CT35? I can't help but hold out hope. I know it's probably wasted hope, but I'm really not wanting her to be a fake.

ballarke
December 19th, 2011, 09:09 PM
Wondering if anyone has heard from CT35? I can't help but hold out hope. I know it's probably wasted hope, but I'm really not wanting her to be a fake.

I'll be posting here when I hear back.

ballarke
December 19th, 2011, 10:52 PM
And jennyb/jennyb233 has been banned. She had plenty of time to respond to the request and never did, despite being online numerous times in the interim.

TheWhskys
December 27th, 2011, 09:04 PM
Looks like CT35 walked away.

Hersheyhighway
December 27th, 2011, 09:08 PM
Looks like CT35 walked away.


with her/his head down....I liked whoever they were....but rules are rules people.

ballarke
December 27th, 2011, 09:43 PM
Looks like CT35 walked away.

with her/his head down....I liked whoever they were....but rules are rules people.

They never replied to the PM. I don't know if they ever actually read it, but they were given plenty of time to actually respond. But with the fact that virtually every picture they posted to the forum was taken from the Internet somewhere, there was virtually no room for them to maneuver. There were pics from not just Lisa Neils, which was the vast majority of what was posted, but at least one other pornstar was identified in the group.

As hershey said, the rules are as they are, and it is that way for a reason. Again this is plagiarism, and that is how we must handle it.

TheWhskys
December 27th, 2011, 10:20 PM
They never replied to the PM. I don't know if they ever actually read it, but they were given plenty of time to actually respond. But with the fact that virtually every picture they posted to the forum was taken from the Internet somewhere, there was virtually no room for them to maneuver. There were pics from not just Lisa Neils, which was the vast majority of what was posted, but at least one other pornstar was identified in the group.

As hershey said, the rules are as they are, and it is that way for a reason. Again this is plagiarism, and that is how we must handle it.

I agree completely!!!! See ya fakers!!!!

SSGOLDSKOOL
January 5th, 2012, 01:33 PM
Someone please look into wannabenaughty's posts and albums. I've friended and seen someone using the same titty pictures. This is a real faker. I haven't seen them anywhere else online but I don't surf porn sites too much. I am a ph fan. I am gonna find out the older name this person used and I'll update you. Another cause for suspicion is he/she keeps asking me to cum on his/her pictures and cannot provide any other pictures that aren't doctored or cut off. Weird.

kooriusgeorge
January 7th, 2012, 07:02 PM
Could be completely wrong, but old name might be wecam69er
Looks familiar

Someone please look into wannabenaughty's posts and albums. I've friended and seen someone using the same titty pictures. This is a real faker. I haven't seen them anywhere else online but I don't surf porn sites too much. I am a ph fan. I am gonna find out the older name this person used and I'll update you. Another cause for suspicion is he/she keeps asking me to cum on his/her pictures and cannot provide any other pictures that aren't doctored or cut off. Weird.

ballarke
January 10th, 2012, 08:25 PM
User Blackdog (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=155517) is now perma-banned. They posted the large close-in pussy pic from this gallery (http://www.coedcherry.com/gallery/met-art/216700) as if it was their own picture. The pic was stupid-easy to find as well, took no time. They'd been called out before for posting pics they didn't own, so now they're gone.

bigmattyboy
January 12th, 2012, 10:08 AM
And jennyb/jennyb233 has been banned. She had plenty of time to respond to the request and never did, despite being online numerous times in the interim.

ye huge faker.. how safe are the pics in our albums?

swat
January 12th, 2012, 10:49 AM
Swat, I noticed this user is still on the forum. Did you ever discuss this issue with that user?

Sorry, didnt notice your post buddy. Not had anything back off them.

Ban time, they have had plenty of time by now.

ballarke
January 12th, 2012, 11:39 AM
ye huge faker.. how safe are the pics in our albums?

There is nothing we can do to stop someone from downloading the pictures you post to the forum. In fact that is a necessary function of the investigations we conduct.

ballarke
January 12th, 2012, 08:48 PM
And I thought CT35 was committed in trying to masquerade as a pornstar. I think I've found someone even more so: littlelaurie (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=515038). She did a bit more than the usual tricks, but I managed to uncover a lot of the pics she posted to the forum came from this photo set (http://beautiful.urlgalleries.net/blog_gallery.php?id=2705341&t=2&g=Lizzy+~+Lizzy+Makes+Me+Dizzy+~). A number of the others are difficult to find, but very likely (if not obviously) have also come from professional shoots.

Some of the pics could easily be hers, but too many are not. For her efforts, she's been banned.

ballarke
January 16th, 2012, 10:19 PM
And next on the ban list is Laureen (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=524150). Sorry to those of you who joined her social group, but the pics were a face superimposed on several different porn models. You might recognize the face if you look at this profile (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=436072), which has also been banned for posting pics to the forum from the Internet, some of which appeared to be photoshops, though that user hasn't been on in over a year...

Lizard69uk
January 21st, 2012, 07:43 PM
Hi everyone. You probably already know this, but I am going to post this here to warn the genuine members and admins of it.


I have just been helping out another site that is having a huge problem with fake profiles.


Please note: Justhookup are setting up spam profiles on adult websites. The links to their site are being disguised under different link names which is catching a lot of people out. elite-sex-life.com will redirect you to justhookup. They are asking people to swap photos on fake profiles which have been set up on other adult websites. Your photos will more than likely be used to set up fake profiles on justhookup.com. Once these profiles have been set up they are asking innocent people to join up to their site for a fee. Be warned! This is a scam!


I will be back here again soon to help out a bit more. Keep up the good work guys. x :)

wannabenaughty
January 23rd, 2012, 02:05 AM
Someone please look into wannabenaughty's posts and albums. I've friended and seen someone using the same titty pictures. This is a real faker. I haven't seen them anywhere else online but I don't surf porn sites too much. I am a ph fan. I am gonna find out the older name this person used and I'll update you. Another cause for suspicion is he/she keeps asking me to cum on his/her pictures and cannot provide any other pictures that aren't doctored or cut off. Weird.
Why have I ended up on here? yes I like guys to cum on my pics but I'm sure as hell arn't going to show you my face.

wannabenaughty
January 23rd, 2012, 02:09 AM
Could be completely wrong, but old name might be wecam69er
Looks familiar
No your completely right, I had to close my old account but I luv what goes on in this site so I came back after 6 or 8 months, like I said I loved this site until I read shit like this, thanks guys.

bigmattyboy
January 23rd, 2012, 03:05 AM
And I thought CT35 was committed in trying to masquerade as a pornstar. I think I've found someone even more so: littlelaurie (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=515038). She did a bit more than the usual tricks, but I managed to uncover a lot of the pics she posted to the forum came from this photo set (http://beautiful.urlgalleries.net/blog_gallery.php?id=2705341&t=2&g=Lizzy+~+Lizzy+Makes+Me+Dizzy+~). A number of the others are difficult to find, but very likely (if not obviously) have also come from professional shoots.

Some of the pics could easily be hers, but too many are not. For her efforts, she's been banned.

Thank you thank you... Such a anoying little shit lol finaly gone thankyou agen:bow:

Lizard69uk
January 24th, 2012, 04:09 PM
The following users photos are displayed all over the web with different profiles set up under different names.
Jessikaz (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=470173)
NaughtySarah (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=309675) (Photos have been deleted)

VirtualAdept
January 25th, 2012, 05:45 PM
I'm sorry Lizard, but just stating they're fakers and the pics are on more than one profile isn't conclusive proof imho.
If you've seen them elsewhere, links are needed to verify it.

ballarke
January 25th, 2012, 07:04 PM
And that is only part of the challenge. Not only do you need to provide links, but the pictures also need to have been posted to other sites before they were posted here to even be considered. There've been times I've found pictures from this forum posted on other websites, and sometimes they get spread around. This is especially true with tumblr, which has a "reblog" feature that allows you to instantly repost a picture to your own picture blog. It's made investigations difficult.

So if you've got links, post 'em and we'll look into it. But don't make accusations without any evidence to back them up.

ballarke
January 27th, 2012, 08:45 PM
And another one: badgirl30 (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=405748)

As I posted to her thread, she tried to pass a few pics from the Internet off as a friend of hers. Along with this, several pics in her albums also turned up hits on other websites as well. I would say she was supplementing what she was providing: quite a few are very likely hers, but it's the ones that demonstrably are not that get you into trouble.

Hersheyhighway
January 27th, 2012, 08:57 PM
How about the....Easter Bunny,Tooth Fairy and Santa...hope their not fakes :D

Keep up the good work weeding out these Fakers. List is getting long :huh:

baldwhoremonger
January 27th, 2012, 10:46 PM
No your completely right, I had to close my old account but I luv what goes on in this site so I came back after 6 or 8 months, like I said I loved this site until I read shit like this, thanks guys.

Just my two cents, but wannabenaughty deserves our full support :thumbsup: you need a better reason to accuse someone of being fake than just a lame disapproval of her cropped photos.

Demand an apology and keep posting!

blackwolf666
January 30th, 2012, 12:13 PM
There seems to be a lot of banning going on. I just have a few questions. How do we know that the threads that say my "GF" or the like are real?? I have always questioned that in my head. And do those women know they have their pictures post on the internet?? Just questions, I don't want to get in trouble for that, just wondering you know.

ballarke
January 30th, 2012, 07:12 PM
Certainly valid concerns, Wolf. And on these we do tend to give those creating the threads the benefit of the doubt. Unless they give us reason to believe not everything's kosher, or if we hear or discover that not everything's kosher, we tend to just presume that everything is good, that the women know their pics are here and approve of it.

There seems to be a lot of banning going on. I just have a few questions. How do we know that the threads that say my "GF" or the like are real?? I have always questioned that in my head. And do those women know they have their pictures post on the internet?? Just questions, I don't want to get in trouble for that, just wondering you know.

Hersheyhighway
January 31st, 2012, 07:00 PM
Bump.....I think its needed.

SecretMILF
February 1st, 2012, 03:03 PM
Yes this is an interesting thread. I've had an issue where I opened a couple of other free admission adult photo sharing site accounts to find that a number of my previously posted pics had been used. I closed my accounts realising that was part of the risk, however it was disappointing. Pichunter allows you to copy and save pics from here too, however thanks to your monitoring and reporting that I feel most comfortable here

CreamTease
February 3rd, 2012, 04:57 AM
ballarke and swat as ever you are doing a great job keeping this site real.

Appreciate your efforts - especially when I know it means you trawling through photo after photo of nude women!

tough job - but we thank you ;)

xx

tansrednab
February 3rd, 2012, 04:36 PM
Swat and Ballarke: looking at boobs all day long for justice.

ballarke
February 3rd, 2012, 09:31 PM
Swat and Ballarke: looking at boobs all day long for justice.

Hard job... but someone's got to do it...

Foxeh
February 8th, 2012, 05:23 AM
i have been a member here for so so long and just wanted to say great job to the moderators, fantastic job guys :)

ballarke
February 15th, 2012, 01:29 AM
Another one: yecta (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=431749)

Virtually every picture this guy has posted to the forum came from some website. One came from Playboy, for Christ's sake! I'd been suspicious of this guy before, but now that I've taken the time to look into things, I can see how far he went. It doesn't look like anything he posted to this forum (except perhaps the male nude pics) was his.

This thread shows pics from this gallery (http://gallerydbase.com/jizz-gfs/1650_cum-soaked-snatch/publicshot.html).


This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=150902) can be found here (http://chanarchive.org/4chan/b/4316).
This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=152179) can be found here (http://behindopendoors.tumblr.com/post/770352463).
This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=161589) can be found here (http://eclecticaerotica.com/entry-point/).
This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=175877) can be found here (http://majorvoyeur.blogspot.com/2008/04/not-feeling-great-this-weekend.html).
This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=161830) can be found here (http://galleries2.adult-empire.com/8835/414627/1116/index.php).
This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=161829) can be found here (http://pussytypes.org/cum-decoration/).
This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=161590) is Playboy model Jessica Leigh (http://www.gigog.com/Jessica-Leigh-Playboy-S-E-X-110_349132.html)
This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=161588) can be found here (http://fhg.cheatingwhorewives.com/54019temp3/index.html).
This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=161389) can be found here (http://altporn.tumblr.com/post/859971774/urban-sex-brigade).
This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=153205) can be found here (http://pplware.sapo.pt/multimedia-2/imagem/fotografia/luz-ao-fundo-do-tunel/).
This picture (http://forum.pichunter.com/album.php?albumid=20414&pictureid=161388) can be found here (http://mondoporno.tumblr.com/post/554095015/katia-handcuffs-free-photos-from-jan-nudes). Original source not available, it seems, but the full picture is displayed.


And that's good enough.

I've sent him a message to let him know the allegations against him. I'll give him a chance to respond to them and see what he says. The identified thread, in the mean time, has been closed. IN his other threads, he embedded his album pictures, but if he starts deleting his album pics en masse, it's the perma-ban for him.

Oh and the girl he identified as "Katerina", in the album in which he explicitly said the pics were not his, is actually Russian nude model Katarina Olendzskaia (http://www.heaven666.org/katerina-olendzskaia-57057.php).

CreamTease
February 15th, 2012, 02:09 AM
Another one: yecta (http://forum.pichunter.com/member.php?u=431749)

Oh and the girl he identified as "Katerina", in the album in which he explicitly said the pics were not his, is actually Russian nude model Katarina Olendzskaia (http://www.heaven666.org/katerina-olendzskaia-57057.php).

well done ballarke - I had reported him a few times for the katerina photos as although he openly said they werent his - posting photos you dont own is against rules

Cant believe he was just stealing the photos though - he kept removing other people's photos from his "Artistic Photos" group because they werent up to his standard required!! If only we had known he meant us to go stela ones which were up to standard!!

glad to see the good work continues xx